Oppo Find X5 vs Sony Xperia 1 IV: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and fast charging, the Oppo Find X5 emerges as the winner. Its 80W wired charging and strong overall performance, coupled with a brighter display, offer a more compelling daily experience. However, the Xperia 1 IV’s superior chipset and creator-focused features make it the better choice for professionals.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X5 | Sony Xperia 1 IV |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 14 | Available. Released 2022, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 72.6 x 8.7 mm (6.31 x 2.86 x 0.34 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 125mm (telephoto), 1/3.5", dual pixel PDAF, 3.5x-5.2x continuous optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.5", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE Audio, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD 30W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Black, Violet, White |
| Models | PFFM10, CPH2307 | XQCT62-B, XQCT54, XQCT54C0V.YD, XQCT54C0B.YD, XQCT54C0W.YD, XQCT54C0V.EEAC, XQCT54C0B.EEAC, XQ-CT72, XQ-CT54, XQ-CT62, SO-51C |
| Price | $ 950.00 / £ 218.30 / € 339.00 | $ 1,120.00 / € 489.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 108h | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.3 LUFS (Good) | -27.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 810715 (v9) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 838832 (v9) GeekBench: 3403 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X5
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially better value for money
- Older Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Less advanced camera features (potentially)
Sony Xperia 1 IV
- Newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 for superior performance
- Advanced camera features and image processing
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Dimmer display compared to the Oppo Find X5
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 807 nits measured, compared to the Xperia 1 IV’s 602 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. While both likely utilize OLED technology, the Find X5’s higher peak brightness provides a more impactful viewing experience for everyday content consumption. The Xperia 1 IV’s display, while excellent, is noticeably dimmer in direct comparison.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but details beyond 'Photo/Video' are limited. The Xperia 1 IV likely benefits from Sony’s advanced image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes, typical of their flagship devices. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s ISP also offers improvements in image processing capabilities. Without specific sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Sony’s history suggests a focus on natural color reproduction and detailed image capture, appealing to photography enthusiasts. The Find X5 likely prioritizes a more vibrant, social media-ready aesthetic.
Performance
The Sony Xperia 1 IV’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) represents a generational leap over the Oppo Find X5’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm). The 4nm process node offers improved thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Xperia 1 IV’s CPU features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, exceeding the Find X5’s 2.84 GHz Cortex-X1. This, combined with newer Cortex-A710 performance cores, results in a tangible performance advantage for the Xperia 1 IV in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Find X5 remains a capable performer for most users.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X5 offers a slight edge in endurance rating at 108 hours compared to the Xperia 1 IV’s 100 hours. However, the real differentiator lies in charging speed. The Find X5’s 80W wired charging is significantly faster than the Xperia 1 IV’s 30W charging, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time. The Xperia 1 IV does offer wireless and reverse wireless charging, features also present on the Find X5 (30W wireless, 10W reverse wireless), but the charging speed gap remains substantial. The Find X5’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery life concerns.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X5 if you need a powerful all-rounder with incredibly fast charging and a vibrant display, and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset. It’s ideal for users who prioritize daily usability and value. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 IV if you are a content creator, videographer, or enthusiast who demands the latest Snapdragon processor, advanced camera controls, and a more specialized, cinematic smartphone experience.