Oppo Find X5 vs. Oppo Find X3 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find X5 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset and impressive 80W wired charging. While the Find X3 Neo offers a respectable experience, the X5's performance and charging speed provide a noticeable upgrade for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X5 | Oppo Find X3 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 14 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 72.6 x 8.7 mm (6.31 x 2.86 x 0.34 in) | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD 30W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black |
| Models | PFFM10, CPH2307 | CPH2207 |
| Price | $ 950.00 / £ 218.30 / € 339.00 | About 180 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 108h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.3 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 810715 (v9) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Find X5
- Significantly faster performance (Snapdragon 888)
- Brighter display (807 nits)
- Much faster 80W wired charging
- Exceptional battery life (108h endurance rating)
- Likely improved camera performance
- Potentially higher price
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Oppo Find X3 Neo
- More affordable (potentially)
- Decent camera system
- Solid battery life
- 65W fast charging
- Slower performance (Snapdragon 865)
- Less bright display
- Slower charging speed
- Older chipset
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 boasts a brighter display with a measured peak brightness of 807 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. Both phones feature excellent contrast ratios, with the Find X5's being nominally infinite. While both likely use AMOLED panels, the X5's brightness advantage is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Generally, the Find X5 is expected to have improvements in image processing and low-light performance due to the newer chipset and potentially updated camera hardware. Video recording capabilities are likely enhanced on the X5 as well.
Performance
The Find X5's Snapdragon 888 (5nm) significantly outperforms the Find X3 Neo's Snapdragon 865 (7nm+). The 888 offers faster processing speeds, improved graphics performance, and better power efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience on the Find X5.
Battery Life
The Find X5 claims an incredible endurance rating of 108h, suggesting exceptional battery optimization. The Find X3 Neo's battery life is likely still good, but not at the same level. The Find X5's 80W wired charging is a massive advantage, allowing for incredibly fast charging times compared to the Find X3 Neo's 65W.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Find X5 is ideal for users who prioritize performance, fast charging, and a brighter display. The Oppo Find X3 Neo is a good option for budget-conscious buyers who still want a capable smartphone with a decent camera and a solid battery life, especially if they find it at a discounted price.