Oppo Find X5 Pro vs Reno8 Pro: A Clash of Flagship and Premium
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Find X5 Pro boasts a more powerful chipset and potentially superior camera capabilities, justifying its higher price. However, the Reno8 Pro offers a brighter display and faster wired charging, making it a compelling choice for users prioritizing those features and value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X5 Pro | Oppo Reno8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 14 | Available. Released 2022, July 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) | Glazed Green, Glazed Black, House of the Dragon |
| Models | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 | CPH2357 |
| Price | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 | ₹ 28,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 101h | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 718351 (v9) GeekBench: 3395 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- More powerful chipset
- Potentially superior camera
- 50W Wireless Charging
- 10W Reverse Wireless Charging
- Higher price
- Slower wired charging compared to Reno8 Pro
Oppo Reno8 Pro
- Brighter display
- Faster wired charging
- More affordable
- Sleek design
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially inferior camera
- No wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Reno8 Pro takes a slight edge with a measured peak brightness of 818 nits compared to the Find X5 Pro's 762 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (Infinite nominal), ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. While both displays are AMOLED, the Reno8 Pro's higher brightness will be noticeable in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature excellent camera systems, but the Find X5 Pro is expected to have a more advanced setup, potentially including larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing. While specific camera specs are missing, the Find X5 Pro's flagship status suggests superior image quality, especially in low light. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities.
Performance
The Find X5 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (or Dimensity 9000 in China) significantly outperforms the Reno8 Pro's Dimensity 8100 Max. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in demanding games on the Find X5 Pro. The Reno8 Pro is still capable, but not in the same league.
Battery Life
Battery life is remarkably similar, with both phones achieving an endurance rating of 100-101 hours. The Reno8 Pro offers notably faster 80W wired charging (31 minutes to 100%) compared to the Find X5 Pro's 12 minutes to 50%. The Find X5 Pro also has 50W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Reno8 Pro.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Find X5 Pro is ideal for power users, photography enthusiasts, and those seeking the latest technology. The Oppo Reno8 Pro is a great option for users who want a premium experience without breaking the bank, prioritizing a vibrant display and quick charging.