Oppo Find X5 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find X5 Lite boasts significantly faster charging and a potentially longer endurance rating. However, the Galaxy A54’s brighter display, more established camera reputation, and Exynos 1380 chipset give it a slight edge for overall usability and future-proofing. It's a close call, but the A54 takes the crown.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X5 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | CPH2371 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.4 LUFS (Average) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X5 Lite
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Potentially longer battery endurance (based on rating)
- Sleek design
- Competitive price
- Mediatek chipset may not be as future-proof
- Camera performance may not match Samsung
- Lower display brightness
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Reputable camera performance and software
- Exynos 1380 chipset offers good performance
- Samsung's software support and ecosystem
- Slower 25W charging
- Battery life slightly less than Find X5 Lite (based on rating)
- Can be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown with its measured 980 nits peak brightness, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. While both phones claim 'infinite' contrast ratios (a marketing term), the A54's higher brightness provides a more impactful viewing experience. The Find X5 Lite's display is still good, but lacks the A54's punch.
Camera Comparison
Samsung has a strong reputation for its camera software and image processing, and the Galaxy A54 is expected to deliver consistent and reliable results. While the Find X5 Lite's camera is capable, it may not match the A54's overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The A54 likely offers more versatile camera features and modes.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 generally offers slightly better sustained performance and efficiency compared to the Mediatek Dimensity 900 in the Find X5 Lite. While both have octa-core CPUs with similar core configurations, the Exynos 1380's 5nm process provides an advantage. Gaming performance is comparable, but the A54 might handle demanding titles slightly better over extended periods.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X5 Lite boasts an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting exceptional battery life. However, the Galaxy A54's active use score of 11:15h is still respectable. The key differentiator here is charging speed: the Find X5 Lite's 65W charging is significantly faster than the A54's 25W, allowing for a much quicker top-up.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Find X5 Lite? Users prioritizing fast charging and potentially longer battery endurance, and those comfortable with Mediatek chipsets. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Those seeking a brighter display, a more reliable camera experience, and the benefits of Samsung's software support and ecosystem.