Oppo Find X5 Lite vs. Oppo Reno8 Lite: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find X5 Lite takes the lead with its significantly faster charging and more powerful chipset. However, the Reno8 Lite offers a more streamlined design and potentially better camera optimization. Ultimately, the Find X5 Lite provides a better overall performance experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X5 Lite | Oppo Reno8 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2022, June 4 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, June 4 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| - | IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | CPH2371 | CPH2343 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.4 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Find X5 Lite
- Faster Charging (65W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Potentially Better Gaming Performance
- Premium Feel
- Potentially Less Refined Camera Software
- Slightly Larger Size
Oppo Reno8 Lite
- Stylish Design
- Potentially Better Camera Optimization
- More Compact Size
- Likely More Affordable
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Lower Peak Performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Find X5 Lite boasts a 'nominal' infinite contrast ratio, suggesting excellent contrast, though this is a marketing term. The Reno8 Lite's display is likely very good as well, but lacks specific contrast ratio data. Resolution and refresh rate are likely similar, around FHD+ and 60Hz, respectively, based on typical Oppo specifications for these models.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Reno8 Lite is often praised for its image processing and color accuracy. The Find X5 Lite's camera hardware is likely comparable, but the Reno8 Lite's software optimization might give it an edge in certain scenarios. Both likely feature a main 64MP sensor and a suite of ultrawide and macro lenses.
Performance
The Find X5 Lite's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Reno8 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 900's Cortex-A78 cores offer higher peak performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. Gaming performance will also be better on the Find X5 Lite.
Battery Life
The Find X5 Lite's 65W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 31 minutes. The Reno8 Lite's 33W charging is considerably slower, taking over an hour to reach 100%. While the Find X5 Lite's endurance rating (123h) is impressive, real-world battery life will depend on usage patterns. The Reno8 Lite's battery capacity is likely similar, around 4500mAh.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Find X5 Lite? Users prioritizing performance, fast charging, and a slightly more premium feel. Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 Lite? Those seeking a stylish, more compact design, and potentially a more refined camera experience, especially if budget is a primary concern.