Oppo Find X5 Lite vs. Find X3 Neo: A Clash of Generations
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Find X3 Neo boasts a significantly more powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset, offering superior performance. However, the Find X5 Lite shines with its incredibly fast 65W charging and potentially better battery endurance. Ultimately, the X3 Neo wins for power users, while the X5 Lite is a strong contender for everyday use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X5 Lite | Oppo Find X3 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black |
| Models | CPH2371 | CPH2207 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.4 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Find X5 Lite
- Faster Charging (31 min)
- Potentially Longer Battery Life
- Modern Design
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Less Powerful Processor
- Unverified Contrast Ratio Claim
- Camera details missing
Oppo Find X3 Neo
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 Processor
- Flagship Performance
- Likely Better Color Accuracy on Display
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slightly Slower Charging (35 min)
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life
- Older Design
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, but the Find X5 Lite's 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term and doesn't provide concrete data. The X3 Neo likely has slightly better color accuracy due to its older, more refined AMOLED technology. Resolution and refresh rate are likely similar, offering a smooth viewing experience on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are not fully provided. However, the Find X5 Lite likely features a more modern camera sensor and image processing algorithms. The X3 Neo's camera is still capable, but may lack some of the newer features found in the X5 Lite. Both likely offer good image quality in well-lit conditions.
Performance
This is where the Find X3 Neo truly excels. The Snapdragon 865 is a powerhouse, significantly outperforming the Dimensity 900 in the Find X5 Lite. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the X3 Neo. The X5 Lite is still capable, but it won't handle intensive tasks as gracefully.
Battery Life
The Find X5 Lite claims an impressive 123h endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. The X3 Neo's battery life is likely good, but not as exceptional as the X5 Lite's claim. Both phones offer 65W fast charging, but the X5 Lite charges slightly faster (31 min vs 35 min).
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Find X5 Lite? Users prioritizing fast charging, a modern design, and decent all-around performance. Who should buy the Oppo Find X3 Neo? Those seeking a flagship-level processor for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, even if it means slightly older technology.