Oppo Find X5 Lite vs. Oppo Find X3 Lite: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find X5 Lite edges out the X3 Lite thanks to its newer chipset, potentially improved camera capabilities (though specifics are limited), and slightly faster charging. However, the X3 Lite's Snapdragon 765G remains a capable performer, and its price might make it a more attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X5 Lite | Oppo Find X3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | CPH2371 | CPH2145 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 210 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.4 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Find X5 Lite
- Newer Chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Potentially Improved Camera
- Faster Charging (31 mins)
- Excellent Battery Life (123h Endurance)
- Potentially Higher Price
- Limited Camera Specs Available
Oppo Find X3 Lite
- Proven Snapdragon 765G Performance
- Potentially Lower Price
- Reliable 65W Charging
- Older Chipset
- Slightly Slower Charging (35 mins)
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar OLED displays with a 6.4-inch size and FHD+ resolution. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio claim on the X5 Lite is largely marketing and doesn't provide concrete data. Expect vibrant colors and good viewing angles on both, but the X5 Lite *might* have slightly improved brightness or color accuracy due to newer panel technology.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for the X5 Lite. However, it's expected to have an improved main sensor and potentially better image processing compared to the X3 Lite. The X3 Lite typically features a 48MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. The X5 Lite likely has a similar setup, but with potentially upgraded sensors and software.
Performance
The Find X5 Lite's Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm) offers a generational leap over the Find X3 Lite's Snapdragon 765G (7nm). While both are octa-core, the Dimensity 900 generally provides better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and improved gaming experiences. The Dimensity 900's efficiency also contributes to better power management.
Battery Life
The Find X5 Lite boasts an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting exceptional battery life. Both phones support 65W wired charging, with the X5 Lite achieving a full charge in 31 minutes versus the X3 Lite's 35 minutes. The Dimensity 900's efficiency likely contributes to the X5 Lite's superior battery performance.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Find X5 Lite? Users prioritizing a more modern chipset, potentially better camera performance, and slightly faster charging. Who should buy the Oppo Find X3 Lite? Those seeking a reliable and capable phone at a potentially lower price point, and who appreciate the proven performance of the Snapdragon 765G.