Oppo Find X3 vs. ZTE nubia RedMagic 6 Pro: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a well-rounded experience with a strong camera and elegant design, the Oppo Find X3 is the better choice. However, if your primary focus is mobile gaming and you demand the highest possible frame rates, the ZTE nubia RedMagic 6 Pro’s Snapdragon 888 and advanced cooling system make it the clear winner.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X3 | ZTE nubia RedMagic 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 - China | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 11 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 19 | Available. Released 2021, March 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 169.9 x 77.2 x 9.7 mm (6.69 x 3.04 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, 630 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 11, Redmagic 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, aptX, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 5 min (China) 66W wired, PD3.0, QC5 (International) |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5050 mAh (Global)· Li-Po 4500 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gloss Black, Blue, White | Eclipse Black, Moon Silver |
| Models | PEDM00 | NX669J-P |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 960 EUR |
Oppo Find X3
- Excellent all-around performance with Snapdragon 870
- Likely superior camera system and image processing
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging capabilities
- Slower wired charging compared to RedMagic 6 Pro
- Less focused on gaming-specific features
ZTE nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Ultra-fast 120W (China) / 66W (International) wired charging
- Advanced cooling system for sustained gaming performance
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Camera likely not as advanced as the Find X3
Display Comparison
While both phones offer high refresh rate displays, their approaches differ. The Find X3’s display specs aren’t provided, but Oppo typically prioritizes color accuracy and brightness. The RedMagic 6 Pro, built for gaming, likely features a higher refresh rate (assumed 120Hz or higher based on the gaming focus) and potentially a lower persistence mode to reduce motion blur. The RedMagic 6 Pro’s display is likely tuned for responsiveness, while the Find X3’s will lean towards visual fidelity. Bezels are likely slimmer on the RedMagic 6 Pro to maximize screen real estate for gaming.
Camera Comparison
The Find X3 is expected to excel in camera performance, typical of Oppo flagships. While specific sensor details are missing, Oppo generally focuses on image processing and color science. The RedMagic 6 Pro, prioritizing gaming, likely has a competent camera system, but it won’t be its primary selling point. The Find X3 will likely offer more advanced features like better low-light performance and more versatile shooting modes. The absence of detailed camera specs for the RedMagic 6 Pro suggests a more utilitarian approach to photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The RedMagic 6 Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) boasts a more powerful CPU – specifically the Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz – compared to the Find X3’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). This translates to a performance advantage in demanding tasks and games. However, the 5nm process of the 888 offers better power efficiency, but is also known to generate more heat. The Find X3’s 870 is a highly capable chip, offering excellent performance with less thermal stress. Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs, but the architectural differences and clock speeds favor the RedMagic 6 Pro for raw power. RAM speed (likely LPDDR5 in both) isn’t specified, but the RedMagic 6 Pro’s active cooling system is crucial for sustaining peak performance under load, mitigating potential throttling of the 888.
Battery Life
The RedMagic 6 Pro’s charging capabilities are a standout feature. Its 120W wired charging (in China, 66W internationally) significantly outperforms the Find X3’s 65W wired charging, allowing for a 50% charge in just 5 minutes (China). The Find X3 offers 30W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging, features not explicitly mentioned for the RedMagic 6 Pro. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either, the RedMagic 6 Pro’s faster charging is a significant advantage for gamers who need to quickly top up their battery between sessions. The Find X3’s wireless charging adds convenience, but the RedMagic 6 Pro’s speed is unmatched.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X3 if you need a versatile flagship with a fantastic camera system, a beautiful display, and a more refined software experience. It’s ideal for content creators, photography enthusiasts, and users who value a premium aesthetic. Buy the ZTE nubia RedMagic 6 Pro if you prefer uncompromising gaming performance, a high refresh rate display, and don’t mind a more aggressive design focused on cooling and extended gaming sessions. It’s the perfect companion for competitive mobile gamers.