Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. While the Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts faster charging and a potentially more consistent performance profile, the Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip delivers superior AI-powered features, a brighter display, and a longer software support commitment, making it the more future-proof option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X3 | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 11 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 19 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification | - |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gloss Black, Blue, White | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | PEDM00 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 600 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X3
- Incredibly fast 65W wired charging
- Proven and reliable Snapdragon 870 performance
- Potentially more consistent thermal management
- Slower software update commitment compared to Pixel
- Less advanced AI features
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Google Tensor chip with AI-powered features
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Guaranteed software updates directly from Google
- Superior computational photography
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Potential for software bugs early in the Tensor lifecycle
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro’s display significantly outshines the Oppo Find X3 Pro in peak brightness, reaching 846 nits measured, compared to an unstated value for the Oppo. Both displays offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. While the Find X3 Pro’s display is undoubtedly high quality, the Pixel 6 Pro’s higher brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger size (6.71 inches vs. 6.7 inches) and potentially adaptive refresh rate (LTPO not confirmed in context, but standard for the Pixel 6 Pro) contribute to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While detailed camera specs are absent, the Pixel 6 Pro’s strength lies in its computational photography prowess, driven by the Tensor chip. Google’s image processing algorithms are renowned for their dynamic range and detail. The Find X3 Pro likely offers excellent image quality, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s AI-powered features, such as Magic Eraser and Face Unblur, provide unique capabilities. The larger sensor size (typically found in Pixel flagships) contributes to better low-light performance. The Find X3 Pro’s camera system is likely more versatile in terms of zoom range, but the Pixel 6 Pro excels in overall image quality and post-processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X3 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm), while the Pixel 6 Pro features Google’s custom Tensor chip (5nm). The Tensor’s 5nm process offers inherent efficiency advantages over the 870’s 7nm node, potentially leading to better thermal management during sustained workloads. The Pixel 6 Pro’s CPU configuration, with 2x Cortex-X1 cores, prioritizes peak performance, while the Snapdragon 870’s octa-core setup balances performance and efficiency. While the Snapdragon 870 is a capable performer, the Tensor’s focus on machine learning tasks gives the Pixel 6 Pro an edge in areas like image processing and voice recognition.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified in context). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Find X3 Pro supports a blazing-fast 65W wired charging, achieving 40% charge in just 10 minutes. In contrast, the Pixel 6 Pro is limited to 23W wired charging, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%. Wireless charging is also faster on the Oppo (30W vs 23W). While the Pixel 6 Pro’s battery life is comparable, the Find X3 Pro offers significantly faster charging convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you prioritize incredibly fast charging (65W wired) and a proven, reliable performance experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and value a consistent, predictable experience. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you want cutting-edge AI features, a brighter and more vibrant display, and guaranteed software updates directly from Google. It’s the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those invested in the Google ecosystem.