Oppo Find X3 Lite vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G: A Detailed Comparison

The Oppo Find X3 Lite and Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, but they achieve this through different approaches to chipset selection, display technology, and charging speeds. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone best suits your needs.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 780G chipset, built on a more efficient 5nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management. While the Oppo Find X3 Lite boasts faster 65W charging, the Mi 11 Lite’s brighter display and overall refinement make it the more well-rounded device.

PHONES
Phone Names	Oppo Find X3 Lite	Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
	-	1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China

Launch
Announced	2021, March 11	2021, March 29
Status	Available. Released 2021, March 19	Available. Released 2021, April 16

Body
Build	-	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back
Dimensions	159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in)	160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz)	159 g (5.61 oz)
	-	IP53, dust and splash resistant

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)
Size	6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio)	6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 750 nits (peak)	AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver)	Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.90 GHz Kryo 670)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm)	Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G (5 nm)
GPU	Adreno 620	Adreno 642
OS	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14

Memory
Card slot	No	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM	64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 2.1	UFS 2.2

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Quad	64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens	-
Single	32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm	20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Triple	-	64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	HDR	HDR, panorama
Single	32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm	20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS	1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	No
35mm jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with dual speakers
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	-	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired	33W wired, PD3.0, QC4
Type	Li-Po 4300 mAh	Li-Po 4250 mAh

Misc
Colors	Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black	Truffle Black, Mint Green, Citrus Yellow
Models	CPH2145	M2101K9G, M2101K9C, M2101K9R
Price	About 210 EUR	About 120 EUR
SAR	-	1.03 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.56 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 106h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-23.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 465534 (v8) \| 522490 (v9) GeekBench: 2909 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Find X3 Lite

Blazing-fast 65W charging
Competitive 5G connectivity
Sleek and lightweight design

Older Snapdragon 765G chipset
Likely lower peak display brightness
Potentially more thermal throttling

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

More powerful Snapdragon 780G chipset
Brighter and more vibrant display
Improved power efficiency

Slower 33W charging
May lack the Find X3 Lite's ultra-fast charging convenience
Potentially less natural color reproduction (depending on preference)

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Oppo Find X3 Lite, whose peak brightness isn't specified but is likely lower. Both displays feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for AMOLED panels. While neither device specifies refresh rates, the Mi 11 Lite’s higher peak brightness and generally better color accuracy (based on Xiaomi’s display calibration history) give it the edge for media consumption and everyday use.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are equipped with photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume the Mi 11 Lite likely features a larger main sensor, benefiting low-light performance. The focus should be on image processing algorithms; Xiaomi typically emphasizes vibrant, social media-ready images, while Oppo often aims for more natural color reproduction. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is unknown for both, but its inclusion on the Mi 11 Lite would further enhance its camera capabilities.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G (5nm), a significant upgrade over the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The 5nm process node of the 780G translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling under sustained loads. The CPU configuration also favors the Mi 11 Lite, with a Kryo 670 prime core clocked at 2.4GHz alongside three Kryo 670 Gold cores at 2.2GHz, versus the Find X3 Lite’s single Kryo 475 Prime at 2.4GHz and three Kryo 475 Gold cores at 2.2GHz. This architectural advantage, combined with the process node difference, means the Mi 11 Lite will handle demanding games and applications more smoothly.

Battery Life

Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 106 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the unspecified mAh capacities. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Oppo Find X3 Lite supports 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G is limited to 33W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support, meaning a slower charging time. This makes the Find X3 Lite ideal for users who frequently need a quick power boost, even if overall battery endurance is comparable.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Find X3 Lite if you prioritize incredibly fast charging and frequently need to top up your battery quickly. Its 65W charging is a significant advantage. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G if you value performance, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more efficient chipset that will likely hold up better over time. It’s the better all-around performer for demanding users.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 780G in the Mi 11 Lite 5G handle demanding games like Genshin Impact smoothly?

Yes, the Snapdragon 780G is significantly more capable than the 765G. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should handle Genshin Impact at medium settings with stable frame rates. The 5nm process also helps mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.

❓ Is the 33W charging on the Mi 11 Lite 5G slow compared to the Oppo Find X3 Lite's 65W?

While 33W is slower than 65W, it's still a respectable charging speed. Expect a full charge in around 1 hour and 15 minutes, which is still acceptable for overnight charging. The trade-off is a more efficient chipset and brighter display.

❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?

Neither Oppo nor Xiaomi typically include microSD card slots in their mid-range 5G devices. You'll need to rely on the internal storage options available at the time of purchase.

❓ How does the software experience differ between ColorOS (Oppo) and MIUI (Xiaomi)?

ColorOS is generally considered to be cleaner and more streamlined than MIUI, which historically has been criticized for bloatware and aggressive battery management. However, Xiaomi has made significant improvements to MIUI in recent versions, making it a more refined experience. Both offer extensive customization options.