Oppo Find X3 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888 (or Exynos 2100) chipset provides significantly more processing power, translating to smoother multitasking and superior gaming performance. While the Oppo Find X3 Lite boasts impressively fast 65W charging, the S21 FE’s overall package offers a more refined experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X3 Lite | Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat19 1600/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 11 | 2022, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 19 | Available. Released 2022, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 155.7 x 74.5 x 7.9 mm (6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 750 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version 1Octa-core (1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.80 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version 2 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) - Version 1Exynos 2100 (5 nm) - Version 2 |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 660 - Version 1Mali-G78 MP14 - Version 2 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 76mm (telephoto), 1/4.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired | 25W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black | White, Graphite, Lavender, Olive |
| Models | CPH2145 | SM-G990B, SM-G990B/DS, SM-G990U, SM-G990U1, SM-G990W, SM-G990E, SM-G9900, SM-G990B2, SM-G990U2, SM-G990W2, SM-G990U3 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 199.00 / $ 143.95 / £ 154.99 / ₹ 29,990 |
| SAR | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.95 W/kg (head) 1.48 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 566529 (v8), 719696 (v9) GeekBench: 3049 (v5.1) GFXBench: 56fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X3 Lite
- Blazing-fast 65W wired charging
- More affordable price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Significantly less powerful processor
- Likely inferior display quality
- Less capable camera system
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 888/Exynos 2100)
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More versatile camera system with advanced ISP
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Higher price tag
- Potential for thermal throttling (Snapdragon 888)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 792 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo Find X3 Lite. While both offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the S21 FE’s higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. The S21 FE’s panel technology is likely superior, potentially including features like adaptive refresh rates (not specified in the data, but common for Samsung flagships) for smoother scrolling and animations. The X3 Lite’s display, while adequate, likely lacks the same level of color accuracy and vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the S21 FE likely holds an edge. While both are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the S21 FE benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 888/Exynos 2100. The S21 FE likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Oppo Find X3 Lite’s camera is likely competent for everyday photography, but it won’t match the S21 FE’s level of detail and clarity. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is assumed on the S21 FE, further enhancing image quality.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G, equipped with either the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm) or the Exynos 2100 (5nm), offers a considerable leap in processing power over the Oppo Find X3 Lite’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at up to 2.84/2.9 GHz, provides a significant advantage in single-core performance, while the combination of Cortex-A78 and A55 cores delivers superior multi-core capabilities. The 5nm process node used in the S21 FE’s chipsets also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The X3 Lite’s Snapdragon 765G is a capable mid-range chip, but it will struggle with demanding games and applications compared to the S21 FE.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 92 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for either device). However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Oppo Find X3 Lite’s 65W wired charging can fully charge the battery in just 35 minutes, a significant advantage. The S21 FE’s 25W wired charging takes 30 minutes to reach 50%, implying a longer full charge time. The S21 FE also supports 15W wireless and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the X3 Lite. While the S21 FE’s charging isn’t as fast, the convenience of wireless charging and reverse wireless charging adds to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X3 Lite if you prioritize extremely fast charging and a more affordable price tag, and your primary use case doesn't involve demanding games or intensive applications. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G if you value raw performance, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more versatile camera system, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed and paying a premium.