Oppo Find X2 vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly brighter display, the Oppo Find X2 emerges as the winner. Its 65W SuperVOOC charging significantly outperforms the Mi 10 Pro’s 50W wired and 30W wireless options. However, the Mi 10 Pro’s endurance rating and wireless charging capabilities offer compelling alternatives.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X2 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2020, February 13. Released 2020, February 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, March 06 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 9 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (Ceramic) / 192 g (Glass) (6.77 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| IP54, dust and water resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Triple-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, 5x hybrid zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.4", AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min | 50W wired, PD3.0 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Ocean | Alpine White, Solstice Grey |
| Models | CPH2023, PDEM10 | M2001J1G |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 930 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 256GB 12GB RAM | $ 1,190.00 | - |
| RENEWED | £ 199.00 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 595246 (v8) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X2
- Blazing-fast 65W wired charging
- Slightly more compact design (likely)
- Potentially more efficient charging protocol
- No wireless charging
- Lower endurance rating (likely)
- Limited camera details available
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G
- Excellent battery endurance (101h)
- 30W wireless charging support
- Slightly brighter display (858 nits)
- Slower wired charging (50W)
- Larger and heavier design (likely)
- Potential for more aggressive image processing
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Find X2 and Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G feature excellent displays, but subtle differences exist. The Mi 10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 858 nits, marginally exceeding the Find X2’s 850 nits. While this difference is unlikely to be noticeable in most scenarios, the Mi 10 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks. Both displays utilize high refresh rates, though the specific refresh rate isn't specified in the provided data. The lack of information on PWM dimming rates prevents a definitive statement on eye strain, but both are likely to employ high-frequency PWM to minimize flicker.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are equipped with capable camera systems, but the provided data only indicates ‘Photo / Video’ capabilities without specifics. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is limited. However, given Xiaomi’s historical emphasis on camera hardware, the Mi 10 Pro likely features a more advanced camera setup, potentially with a larger main sensor. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing gimmick with limited practical value. Image processing styles will also differ, with Oppo typically favoring more vibrant colors and Xiaomi leaning towards a more natural look.
Performance
Under the hood, both phones are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), coupled with an Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). This means raw processing power will be virtually identical for most tasks. The performance will be limited by the chipset itself, not the CPU configuration. The absence of RAM speed (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR4X) in the provided data prevents a detailed analysis of multitasking performance. Thermal management, a critical factor for sustained performance, is not specified, but both phones likely employ similar cooling solutions to prevent throttling during demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G holds an advantage in endurance, boasting a 101-hour rating. While the Oppo Find X2’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Mi 10 Pro’s longer endurance suggests a larger battery. However, the Find X2 compensates with significantly faster charging: 65W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 38 minutes, versus the Mi 10 Pro’s 50W wired and 30W wireless options. The Mi 10 Pro also offers 5W reverse wireless charging, a feature absent on the Find X2.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X2 if you need the absolute fastest wired charging available and value a consistently bright display for outdoor visibility. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G if you prioritize longer battery life between charges, appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, and desire a phone with a slightly higher peak display brightness, even if the difference is minimal.