Oppo Find X2 vs Sony Xperia 1 III: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and charging speed, the Oppo Find X2 emerges as the winner. Its significantly brighter screen and 65W charging are compelling advantages. However, the Xperia 1 III’s Snapdragon 888 and focus on photography make it a strong contender for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X2 | Sony Xperia 1 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA (specific) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, March 06 | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (Ceramic) / 192 g (Glass) (6.77 oz) | 186 g / 187.1 g (mmWave) (6.56 oz) |
| IP54, dust and water resistant | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.4", AF | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Ocean | Frosted Black, Frosted Gray, Frosted Purple |
| Models | CPH2023, PDEM10 | XQBC62/V, XQBC52V.UKCX, SO-51B, SOG03, A101SO, XQ-BC62, XQ-BC72, XQ-BC52, XQ-BC01, XQ-BC11, XQ-BC21, XQ-BC72 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | € 505.26 / $ 903.43 |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 256GB 12GB RAM | $ 1,190.00 | - |
| RENEWED | £ 199.00 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 607423 (v8) GeekBench: 3515 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X2
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Blazing-fast 65W wired charging
- Supports PD and reverse wireless charging
- Older Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Less emphasis on professional camera features
Sony Xperia 1 III
- Newer Snapdragon 888 chipset for improved performance
- Sony’s camera expertise and image processing
- Long battery endurance rating
- Dimmer display compared to the Oppo Find X2
- Slower 30W charging speed
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 boasts a notably brighter display, peaking at 850 nits measured, compared to the Xperia 1 III’s 620 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both feature infinite (nominal) contrast ratios, the Find X2’s higher peak brightness is a significant advantage for outdoor users. The Xperia 1 III’s display, while excellent, is demonstrably dimmer. Neither specification details refresh rate, but both are expected to be 120Hz based on their market positioning. The Find X2’s brightness advantage is particularly impactful for HDR content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer capable photo and video recording, but their approaches differ. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Sony’s history suggests a focus on color accuracy and dynamic range, while Oppo often prioritizes more vibrant, social media-friendly images. The Xperia 1 III benefits from Sony’s expertise in camera technology, potentially offering superior image processing. The absence of specific sensor details makes a direct comparison challenging, but the Xperia 1 III’s brand reputation in camera technology gives it a slight edge.
Performance
The Xperia 1 III leverages the newer Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm) chipset, featuring a Cortex-X1 prime core, offering a theoretical performance edge over the Find X2’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+). The Cortex-X1 core in the 888 is designed for peak performance, while the 865 relies on the Cortex-A77. Both phones have 12GB of RAM, but the 5nm process of the 888 should result in better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. However, real-world performance differences may be less pronounced than the architectural advantages suggest, depending on software optimization.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 82 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite the Find X2’s lack of specified mAh. However, their charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Find X2’s 65W wired charging can reach 100% in just 38 minutes, while the Xperia 1 III’s 30W charging takes 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Find X2 also supports PD and reverse wireless charging, features absent from the Xperia 1 III’s listed specifications. The Find X2’s charging speed is a clear advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X2 if you need a phone with a vibrant, easily viewable display, especially outdoors, and value incredibly fast charging. It’s ideal for media consumption and everyday use. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 III if you prioritize a more refined camera experience, demand the latest Snapdragon processor for sustained performance, and appreciate a more professional-oriented feature set, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed.