Oppo Find X2 vs. Realme X50 Pro Player: A Detailed Snapdragon 865 Flagship Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and a slightly more refined experience, the Oppo Find X2 emerges as the winner. However, the Realme X50 Pro Player delivers nearly identical performance at a significantly lower price, making it the ideal choice for budget-conscious gamers and power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X2 | Realme X50 Pro Player |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2020, May 25. Released 2020, June 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, March 06 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Unspecified), glass back (Unspecified), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (Ceramic) / 192 g (Glass) (6.77 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| IP54, dust and water resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.4", AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (standard), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Ocean | Light Speed Silver, Phantom Black |
| Models | CPH2023, PDEM10 | RMX2072 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 256GB 12GB RAM | $ 1,190.00 | - |
| RENEWED | £ 199.00 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) | - |
Oppo Find X2
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially superior camera image quality
- Potentially better thermal management
- Significantly higher price
- May offer only incremental improvements over the X50 Pro Player
Realme X50 Pro Player
- Exceptional value for money
- Fast 65W charging
- Identical Snapdragon 865 performance
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less refined camera experience
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 boasts a measured peak brightness of 850 nits, a significant advantage over the likely lower brightness of the X50 Pro Player (though specific measurements are unavailable). While both utilize high refresh rate displays, the Find X2’s superior brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. The Find X2 likely benefits from Oppo’s color calibration expertise, offering more accurate color reproduction, crucial for photo and video editing. The X50 Pro Player, while still excellent, likely prioritizes refresh rate over absolute color accuracy to hit its price point.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. Given the Find X2’s higher price point, it likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The X50 Pro Player, while capable, likely focuses on delivering competitive image quality at a lower cost. Without detailed sensor specifications, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera performance, but the Find X2’s positioning suggests a more refined photographic experience. We can assume both phones will offer a range of shooting modes, but the Find X2 likely excels in low-light performance and dynamic range.
Performance
Both the Oppo Find X2 and Realme X50 Pro Player are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). This means CPU performance will be virtually indistinguishable in everyday tasks and most gaming scenarios. The key difference lies in thermal management, which is unknown for the X50 Pro Player. The Find X2’s larger chassis *potentially* allows for a more robust cooling solution, mitigating thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. Both utilize LPDDR5 RAM, ensuring fast application loading and multitasking.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Find X2 and Realme X50 Pro Player support 65W wired charging with PD, achieving a full charge in 38 minutes (Find X2) and 35 minutes (X50 Pro Player). This incredibly fast charging speed is a major benefit for both devices, minimizing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the slightly longer charging time of the Find X2 *could* indicate a marginally larger battery, but the difference is likely minimal. The real-world impact of this difference will be negligible for most users, as both phones offer all-day battery life with moderate usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X2 if you need a brighter, more color-accurate display for media consumption and appreciate a premium build quality. Buy the Realme X50 Pro Player if you prioritize raw performance-per-dollar, fast charging, and don't mind a slightly less polished overall experience. Both are excellent choices for demanding mobile tasks, but cater to different priorities.