Oppo Find X2 vs OnePlus 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the OnePlus 8 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. While the Oppo Find X2 boasts a slightly brighter display, the OnePlus 8 Pro’s significantly lower price, coupled with comparable performance and a robust battery life, makes it the more practical and value-driven option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X2 | OnePlus 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 78 SA/NSA - IN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2020, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, March 06 | Available. Released 2020, April 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 165.3 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm (6.51 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (Ceramic) / 192 g (Glass) (6.77 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| IP54, dust and water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.4, (Color filter camera) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.4", AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min | 30W wired, 50% in 23 min 30W wireless, 50% in 30 min 3W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4510 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Ocean | Glacial Green, Ultramarine Blue, Onyx Black |
| Models | CPH2023, PDEM10 | IN2023, IN2020, IN2021, IN2025 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 310 EUR |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 428.39 |
| 256GB 12GB RAM | $ 1,190.00 | $ 853.51 |
| RENEWED | £ 199.00 | $ 486.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) | -23.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 573276 (v8) GeekBench: 3374 (v5.1) GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X2
- Higher peak display brightness (850 nits)
- Extremely fast 65W wired charging
- Premium build quality (assumed based on brand positioning)
- Significantly higher price ($1,190)
- Lacks wireless charging
- Limited battery information
OnePlus 8 Pro
- Much lower price ($853.51 / $428.39)
- Versatile charging options (wired, wireless, reverse wireless)
- Excellent battery endurance (103h)
- Slower wired charging than Oppo Find X2
- Display brightness potentially lower than Oppo Find X2
- Image processing style may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Find X2 and OnePlus 8 Pro feature excellent displays, but subtle differences exist. The Oppo Find X2 reaches a measured peak brightness of 850 nits, offering superior visibility outdoors. The OnePlus 8 Pro, while lacking a specific brightness figure, boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both utilize high refresh rate panels, though the specific refresh rate isn't provided in the data. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s display benefits from a potentially wider color gamut and more sophisticated calibration, given OnePlus’s history with display tuning. The lack of LTPO information for either device means we can't assess dynamic refresh rate efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. This makes a direct comparison challenging. Given OnePlus’s collaboration with Hasselblad in later models, it’s reasonable to assume the OnePlus 8 Pro’s image processing leans towards a more natural color profile. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a significant omission. Without this information, assessing low-light performance and video stabilization is impossible. The lack of mention of specific lens types (ultrawide, telephoto) further limits the comparison.
Performance
Both devices are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) chipset and an Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). This means raw processing power is virtually identical. The 12GB of RAM in the specified configurations ensures smooth multitasking on both. Thermal management, however, is an unknown factor. Without specific testing data, it’s difficult to determine which device sustains peak performance for longer periods. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s larger chassis *could* offer slightly better thermal dissipation, but this is speculative.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 8 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 103 hours, indicating strong battery life. The Oppo Find X2’s battery capacity is not specified, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the OnePlus 8 Pro’s charging capabilities are significantly more versatile. It supports 30W wired charging (50% in 23 minutes), 30W wireless charging (50% in 30 minutes), and 3W reverse wireless charging. The Oppo Find X2 offers a blazing-fast 65W wired charging (100% in 38 minutes) but lacks wireless charging options. This makes the OnePlus 8 Pro more convenient for users who prefer wireless charging or need to top up other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X2 if you prioritize absolute peak display brightness and are willing to pay a premium for it. Its 850 nits max brightness will be noticeable in direct sunlight. Buy the OnePlus 8 Pro if you value a balanced package of performance, battery life, and affordability. The wider range of RAM/storage options and significantly lower price point make it ideal for users seeking flagship features without breaking the bank.