Oppo Find X2 vs. Google Pixel 5a: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balanced experience and excellent software support, the Google Pixel 5a 5G is the stronger choice. While the Oppo Find X2 boasts significantly more raw processing power, the Pixel 5a’s efficient chipset, coupled with Google’s software optimization, delivers comparable real-world performance and superior battery consistency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X2 | Google Pixel 5a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, March 06 | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 209 g (Ceramic) / 192 g (Glass) (6.77 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| IP54, dust and water resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.4", AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4680 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Ocean | Mostly Black |
| Models | CPH2023, PDEM10 | G1F8F, G4S1M |
| Price | About 310 EUR | $ 189.00 / C$ 249.99 |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 256GB 12GB RAM | $ 1,190.00 | - |
| RENEWED | £ 199.00 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X2
- Significantly faster processor for demanding tasks
- 65W fast charging for quick power-ups
- Potentially more RAM for heavy multitasking
- Likely shorter battery life due to power-hungry chipset
- Software support may be limited compared to Pixel
- Camera details are lacking, making it hard to assess quality
Google Pixel 5a 5G
- Excellent battery life and efficiency
- Superior camera image processing and software
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Less powerful processor for intensive gaming or video editing
- Slower charging speeds
- May struggle with extremely demanding multitasking
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Find X2 and Google Pixel 5a 5G feature displays capable of reaching high brightness levels, with the Pixel 5a marginally edging out the Find X2 at 861 nits versus 850 nits measured. While both offer excellent visibility, the Find X2’s panel specifications are not detailed enough to assess potential differences in color accuracy or panel technology. The Pixel 5a’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a typical OLED implementation, providing deep blacks. The lack of high refresh rate information on either device means neither caters to users prioritizing ultra-smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed with a focus on photography and video, but their approaches differ. The Oppo Find X2’s camera specifications are limited to ‘Photo / Video’ without details on sensor size or resolution. The Pixel 5a 5G benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography, leveraging its image processing algorithms to produce consistently excellent results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Without specific sensor details for the Find X2, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance or dynamic range capabilities. The Pixel 5a’s strength lies in its software, consistently delivering high-quality images with minimal user effort.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X2’s Snapdragon 865, built on a 7nm+ process, features a powerful octa-core CPU configuration with a prime Cortex-A77 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. This is a substantial step up from the Google Pixel 5a’s Snapdragon 765G, which utilizes a 7nm process and a Kryo 475 Prime core at 2.4 GHz. However, the 765G’s architecture is more efficient, and Google’s software optimization mitigates the raw performance gap in everyday tasks. The Find X2’s 12GB of RAM versus the Pixel 5a’s unspecified amount (likely 6GB or 8GB) further contributes to its multitasking advantage, though the impact is less noticeable for typical usage.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 5a 5G boasts an endurance rating of 122 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Oppo Find X2’s battery capacity is unknown, its more power-hungry Snapdragon 865 chipset and higher peak performance likely result in shorter battery life. The Find X2 compensates with significantly faster 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 38 minutes, compared to the Pixel 5a’s 18W charging. This means the Find X2 can quickly top up, but the Pixel 5a offers longer sustained usage between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X2 if you absolutely need the fastest possible processing speeds for demanding tasks like video editing or graphically intensive gaming, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you prioritize a consistently smooth experience, exceptional camera image processing, guaranteed software updates, and all-day battery life without compromise.