Oppo Find X2 vs. Asus ROG Phone 3: A Deep Dive into Flagship Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and fast charging, the Oppo Find X2 is a compelling choice. However, the Asus ROG Phone 3 emerges as the clear winner for mobile gamers, thanks to its Snapdragon 865+ chipset and optimized thermal design, despite a slightly dimmer screen.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X2 | Asus ROG Phone 3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 - A version |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - A version |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - A version |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G 4.4 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2020, July 22. Released 2020, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, March 06 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 171 x 78 x 9.9 mm (6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (Ceramic) / 192 g (Glass) (6.77 oz) | 240 g (8.47 oz) |
| IP54, dust and water resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~79.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 650 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.10 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, ROG UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.4", AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 11mm, 125˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 24 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with DTS:X stereo speakers (2 dedicated amplifiers) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min | 30W wired, PD3.0, QC4 10W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Ocean | Black Glare |
| Models | CPH2023, PDEM10 | ASUS_I003D, ZS661KS, I003DD, I003D |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 650 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) 1.50 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 256GB 12GB RAM | $ 1,190.00 | - |
| RENEWED | £ 199.00 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 120h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) | -23.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 621932 (v8) GeekBench: 13306 (v4.4), 3386 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X2
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Ultra-fast 65W wired charging
- Potentially superior camera image quality (based on brand positioning)
- Slightly less powerful processor (Snapdragon 865 vs 865+)
- Likely shorter battery life compared to ROG Phone 3
Asus ROG Phone 3
- More powerful Snapdragon 865+ processor for gaming
- Excellent battery endurance (120h rating)
- Optimized thermal management for sustained performance
- Dimmer display compared to Oppo Find X2
- Slower 30W wired charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 boasts a significant advantage in display brightness, reaching a measured 850 nits compared to the ROG Phone 3’s 719 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize AMOLED technology, the Find X2’s higher peak brightness and likely superior color calibration (though not specified) make it the better choice for media consumption. The ROG Phone 3, however, offers an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels, and a 120Hz refresh rate (not specified for the Find X2, but likely 60Hz), contributing to smoother animations, particularly beneficial in gaming. The lack of LTPO technology in either device means refresh rate scaling isn't as efficient as newer panels.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature capable camera systems, but the context data provides limited detail for a thorough comparison. Both are described as offering 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Without sensor size or megapixel counts, it’s difficult to definitively assess image quality. However, given Asus’s gaming focus, the ROG Phone 3’s camera is likely tuned for speed and convenience rather than photographic excellence. The Find X2, positioned as a flagship, likely prioritizes image quality and offers more advanced camera features, though specifics are unavailable. The absence of detail regarding OIS or lens apertures further hinders a meaningful comparison.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G chipset, but the ROG Phone 3 features the slightly enhanced Snapdragon 865+ variant. This 'plus' version boasts a higher peak CPU clock speed – 3.10 GHz on the ROG Phone 3 versus 2.84 GHz on the Find X2 – resulting in a marginal performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. Both share the same CPU core configuration (1x Cortex-A77 at higher clock, 3x Cortex-A77, 4x Cortex-A55). The ROG Phone 3’s larger vapor chamber cooling system and optimized software further contribute to sustained performance under heavy load, mitigating thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. Both devices utilize 12GB of RAM, ensuring smooth multitasking.
Battery Life
The Asus ROG Phone 3 claims an impressive 120-hour endurance rating, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Find X2’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the ROG Phone 3’s endurance rating, combined with its 30W charging (versus the Find X2’s significantly faster 65W), indicates a focus on longevity. The Find X2’s 65W wired charging can fully charge the device in just 38 minutes, a substantial advantage over the ROG Phone 3’s slower charging speed. The ROG Phone 3 also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Find X2.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X2 if you need a beautifully designed phone with a vibrant, bright display for everyday use, content consumption, and photography. It’s ideal for users who value a balanced experience and rapid charging. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 3 if you prioritize sustained gaming performance, long battery life, and features tailored to mobile esports, even if it means sacrificing some display brightness and a more subdued aesthetic.