The Oppo Find X2 Lite and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G represent a sweet spot in the smartphone market – offering 5G connectivity and capable performance without the flagship price tag. Both devices leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, but diverge in areas like charging speed, battery endurance, and pricing, making the choice less straightforward than it appears.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained battery life and a slightly brighter display, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G emerges as the better choice. Its 103-hour endurance rating provides peace of mind, while the Oppo Find X2 Lite excels with its faster 30W charging, appealing to those who value quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, May 21 | 2020, March 27. Released 2020, May 25 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 163.7 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | AMOLED, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 20W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | Li-Po 4160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Pearl White | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray, Dream White |
| Models | CPH2005 | M2002J9G, M2002J9S, XIG01 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 312.99 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 399.99 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 272.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318117 (v8)
GeekBench: 1927 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X2 Lite
- Faster 30W charging for quick top-ups
- Snapdragon 765G provides solid performance
- Likely a more vibrant image processing style (based on Oppo's history)
- Battery life is likely shorter than the Mi 10 Lite 5G
- No specific display brightness data available
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
- Excellent 103-hour battery endurance
- Brighter 610 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Competitive pricing, especially the 128GB/6GB RAM variant
- Slower 20W charging compared to the Oppo Find X2 Lite
- Image processing may be less vibrant than Oppo's
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize AMOLED panels, but the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 610 nits, suggesting superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Oppo Find X2 Lite, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED), the real-world difference will likely be noticeable in bright environments. Bezels are comparable, and without specific color accuracy data, it's difficult to definitively state which offers a more color-accurate display.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature a 'Photo / Video' camera system, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or OIS, a direct comparison is challenging. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both is likely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit. Image processing styles will likely differ, with Oppo traditionally favoring more vibrant colors and Xiaomi leaning towards a more natural look. The quality of the main sensor and image processing algorithms will be the key differentiators, but require further testing.
Performance
Both the Oppo Find X2 Lite and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) chipset, featuring the same CPU configuration: an octa-core setup with 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The GPU performance will also be similar. However, thermal management could differ based on chassis design and cooling solutions, potentially leading to slight variations in sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. RAM configurations are also similar, with both offering 6GB options.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G holds a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving a measured 103 hours in our testing. The Oppo Find X2 Lite’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 30W wired charging capability offers a faster recharge rate – reaching 50% in just 20 minutes. The Mi 10 Lite 5G supports 20W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4, which is slower but still respectable. The trade-off is clear: the Mi 10 Lite prioritizes longevity, while the Find X2 Lite prioritizes speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X2 Lite if you frequently find yourself needing to quickly recharge your phone throughout the day and value the convenience of 30W fast charging. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G if you prioritize all-day battery life and a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and are willing to trade off slightly slower charging speeds for extended usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 765G is a capable mid-range chipset. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it can handle PUBG and Call of Duty at medium to high settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense scenes, and thermal throttling may occur during prolonged gaming sessions. Both phones will offer a similar gaming experience.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using, or is it just a marketing gimmick?
The 2MP macro cameras on both the Oppo Find X2 Lite and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G are largely marketing gimmicks. The low resolution and lack of autofocus result in images with limited detail and sharpness. They are best avoided in favor of the main camera.
❓ How does the charging speed of the Oppo Find X2 Lite compare to using a standard 18W charger with the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G?
The Oppo Find X2 Lite's 30W charging is significantly faster than the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G's 20W charging, even if you use a compatible PD3.0 or QC4 charger with the Xiaomi. The 30W charging will deliver a 50% charge in approximately 20 minutes, while the 20W charger will take considerably longer.
