Oppo Find X2 Lite vs Realme X50 5G: A Tale of Two Snapdragon 765G Implementations
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing the fastest possible charging, the Realme X50 5G edges out the Oppo Find X2 Lite. While both reach 30W wired charging, the X50 5G achieves 70% charge in 30 minutes, compared to the X2 Lite’s 50%. This makes the X50 5G the better choice for those constantly on the go.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X2 Lite | Realme X50 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, May 21 | 2020, July 08. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Pearl White | Jungle Green, Ice Silver |
| Models | CPH2005 | RMX2144 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 500 EUR |
Oppo Find X2 Lite
- Potentially more refined software experience with ColorOS
- Oppo’s reputation for color accuracy in displays
- Slightly more understated design aesthetic
- Slower charging speed (50% in 20 minutes)
- Likely less aggressive performance tuning
Realme X50 5G
- Faster charging speed (70% in 30 minutes)
- Realme UI offers extensive customization options
- Potentially more aggressive performance profile
- Realme UI can be more bloated with pre-installed apps
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize AMOLED panels, a standard for this price point, but detailed display specs (resolution, peak brightness, color gamut coverage) are missing from the provided data. Given the market positioning, we can infer both likely target FHD+ resolution. The absence of high refresh rate information suggests neither prioritizes a 90Hz or 120Hz experience. The real-world difference will likely come down to color calibration and peak brightness, areas where Oppo historically excels.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the quality will depend on sensor size, lens apertures, and image processing algorithms. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) suggests neither phone prioritizes advanced stabilization. Image processing is where Oppo and Realme typically diverge, with Oppo leaning towards more natural colors and Realme often boosting saturation for a more vibrant look. The usefulness of any included macro cameras (often 2MP) is questionable, offering limited detail and utility.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Oppo Find X2 Lite and Realme X50 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) with the same CPU configuration – an octa-core setup featuring 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores. This means gaming performance and app loading times will be virtually indistinguishable. However, thermal management – how effectively each phone dissipates heat – could vary, impacting sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. Realme often prioritizes aggressive performance profiles, potentially leading to more throttling under load.
Battery Life
While the battery capacity isn't specified, the charging speed is a key differentiator. Both support 30W wired charging, but the Realme X50 5G achieves 70% charge in 30 minutes, while the Oppo Find X2 Lite only reaches 50% in 20 minutes. This suggests the Realme X50 5G may have a more efficient charging circuit or a different charging curve. The faster charging of the X50 5G is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X2 Lite if you value a potentially more refined software experience, typical of Oppo’s ColorOS, and a slightly more understated design. Buy the Realme X50 5G if you prioritize rapid charging speeds and are comfortable with Realme UI, which often focuses on customization and performance tweaks. Both offer excellent value for a 5G experience, but cater to slightly different user preferences.