Oppo Find X2 Lite vs Motorola Edge 70: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 70 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset delivers significantly better performance and efficiency than the Find X2 Lite’s Snapdragon 765G, and the 68W charging is a game-changer. While the Find X2 Lite offers value, the Edge 70 provides a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X2 Lite | Motorola Edge 70 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, May 21 | 2025, October 29 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, October 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 74 x 6 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.24 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 722 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 16, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Pearl White | Pantone: Gadget Gray, Lily Pad, Bronze Green |
| Models | CPH2005 | XT2601-2, XT2603-2 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | £ 799.00 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 50:14h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class A |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Oppo Find X2 Lite
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- 5G connectivity
- Older chipset with lower performance
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially less efficient battery life
Motorola Edge 70
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
- 68W fast charging and 15W wireless charging
- Excellent battery endurance (50:14h)
- Higher price compared to the Find X2 Lite
- May not be significantly better in all camera scenarios
- Software updates may be less frequent than Oppo
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Edge 70's newer release, it likely benefits from a more modern panel with improved color accuracy and potentially higher peak brightness. The Find X2 Lite, being older, may exhibit wider bezels. Without specific nit ratings or panel technology details, we can assume the Edge 70 offers a more visually refined experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, Motorola generally focuses on computational photography, meaning the Edge 70 likely employs more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The newer chipset also provides a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) for faster image capture and improved low-light performance. While the Find X2 Lite may have a decent camera for its price point, the Edge 70’s processing capabilities likely give it an edge in image quality and dynamic range.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 70’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) represents a substantial leap over the Oppo Find X2 Lite’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Edge 70’s CPU configuration – a 2.8 GHz Cortex-720 prime core alongside four 2.4 GHz Cortex-720 cores and three 1.8 GHz Cortex-520 cores – is architecturally more advanced than the Find X2 Lite’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and six 1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores. This means the Edge 70 will handle multitasking, gaming, and app loading with greater speed and responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 70 boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 68W wired charging, capable of rapidly replenishing the battery. The Oppo Find X2 Lite’s 30W charging is considerably slower. The Edge 70’s battery endurance is rated at 50:14h, with an active use score of 13:36h, indicating excellent battery life. While the Find X2 Lite’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Edge 70’s combination of efficient chipset and fast charging provides a more convenient and reliable user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X2 Lite if you prioritize absolute affordability and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset. It’s a good option for basic smartphone tasks and users on a tight budget. Buy the Motorola Edge 70 if you value performance, fast charging, and a more modern feature set. It’s ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming, streaming, and want a phone that will last longer without needing a recharge.