Oppo Find X2 Lite vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: A Deep Dive into the Snapdragon 765G Experience
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing software support and camera quality, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is the superior choice. While the Oppo Find X2 Lite boasts significantly faster 30W charging, the Pixel’s clean Android experience and computational photography prowess offer a more refined and long-lasting user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X2 Lite | Google Pixel 4a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6, mmWave (market dependant) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (1.9 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 20. Released 2020, May 21 | 2020, September 30 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 153.9 x 74 x 8.2 mm (Sub-6) or 8.5 mm (Sub-6 and mmWave) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 168 g (5G Sub-6); 171 g ( 5G Sub-6 and mmWave) (5.93 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 107˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh | Li-Po 3885 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Black, Pearl White | Just Black, Clearly White |
| Models | CPH2005 | GD1YQ, G025I, G025E, G025H, G6QU3 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 140 EUR |
Oppo Find X2 Lite
- Significantly faster 30W charging
- Potentially more vibrant display (Oppo's typical calibration)
- Likely more affordable price point
- Software updates may be less frequent
- Potential for more bloatware
- Thermal throttling possible under sustained load
Google Pixel 4a 5G
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Exceptional camera performance with Google’s image processing
- Strong resale value
- Slower 18W charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potentially less vibrant display (Pixel's color accuracy focus)
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications in the provided data, but given their market positioning, we can infer similarities. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors. The key difference will likely be color calibration; Pixel phones are known for color accuracy, while Oppo tends towards more saturated hues. The absence of refresh rate data suggests both operate at 60Hz. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within their respective price brackets.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature the Snapdragon 765G’s ISP, Google’s computational photography expertise gives the Pixel 4a 5G a distinct advantage. The Pixel’s image processing algorithms are renowned for their dynamic range, detail preservation, and low-light performance. Without specific sensor details for the Oppo Find X2 Lite, it’s reasonable to assume a more hardware-dependent approach to image capture. The Pixel 4a 5G’s strength lies in its software, extracting maximum quality from its sensor, while the Oppo likely relies more on sensor size and lens quality. The absence of OIS data for either phone suggests image stabilization relies primarily on electronic image stabilization (EIS).
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Oppo Find X2 Lite and Google Pixel 4a 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) with the same octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver). This means CPU-bound tasks like web browsing and app loading will perform similarly. However, sustained performance could differ based on thermal design. Oppo often prioritizes thin designs, potentially leading to more aggressive thermal throttling under prolonged load compared to the Pixel 4a 5G, which may have more internal space for heat dissipation. RAM configurations, not provided, will also impact multitasking.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the charging speeds are a clear differentiator. The Oppo Find X2 Lite’s 30W wired charging, capable of delivering 50% charge in 20 minutes, is significantly faster than the Pixel 4a 5G’s 18W wired charging with PD2.0. This means the Oppo can top up quickly, mitigating concerns about battery life. However, faster charging doesn’t necessarily equate to better overall battery life; it simply reduces downtime. The Pixel 4a 5G’s PD2.0 support ensures compatibility with a wider range of chargers, while the Oppo’s proprietary 30W charging requires a compatible adapter for optimal speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X2 Lite if you need blazing-fast charging and prioritize screen-on time over software longevity. Its 30W charging capability is a significant advantage for power users. Buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G if you prefer a clean, bloatware-free Android experience, exceptional camera performance driven by Google’s image processing, and guaranteed software updates for years to come.