Oppo Find N5 vs. Huawei Mate X3: A Deep Dive into Foldable Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find N5 emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset delivers demonstrably faster performance and improved efficiency, offsetting the Mate X3’s slightly better battery endurance rating. The Find N5’s brighter display and faster charging further solidify its position as the leading foldable.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find N5 | Huawei Mate X3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 19 | 2023, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February 26 | Available. Released 2023, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Nanocrystal Glass) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum alloy frame, titanium alloy hinge | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.9 x 145.6 x 4.2 mmFolded: 160.9 x 74.4 x 8.9 mm | Unfolded: 156.9 x 141.5 x 5.3 mmFolded: 156.9 x 72.4 x 11.1 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 229 g (8.08 oz) | 239 g or 241 g (8.43 oz) |
| - | IPX8 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Kunlun Glass (cover display only) |
| Resolution | 2248 x 2480 pixels (~412 ppi density) | 2224 x 2496 pixels (~426 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.12 inches, 211.7 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.85 inches, 197.5 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO OLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 120Hz, 1400 nits (HBM), 2100 nits (peak) | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| - | Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, 6.4 inches, 1080 x 2504 pixels | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 7-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 5x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-3-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | HarmonyOS 3.1 (China), EMUI 13.1 (Europe), no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 1/1.56”, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.7, 75mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.75", 3x optical zoom, PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0”, 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps gyro-EIS, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8MP, f/2.4, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0”, 1.12µm Cover camera: 8MP, f/2.4, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0”, 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.4, (wide) Cover camera: 8 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (Dolby Atmos enhanced) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (B1I+B1c+B2a), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2, Display Port, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band or tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeter |
| - | BDS Satellite Message | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 50 min 50W wireless Reverse wired | 66W wired 50W wireless 7.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5600 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 4800 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5060 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Misty White, Dusk Purple | Black, White, Violet, Dark Green, Gold |
| Models | CPH2671, PKH110, PKH120 | ALT-AL00, ALT-L29 |
| Price | € 1,435.00 / $ 1,959.00 / £ 1,699.00 | About 1500 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 993592 (v9) GeekBench: 4283 (v5.5), 4512 (v6) GFXBench: 41fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find N5
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8 Elite)
- Brighter and more vibrant display (1188 nits)
- Faster charging speeds (80W wired, 50W wireless)
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Mate X3
- Newer device, potential for early software bugs
Huawei Mate X3
- Strong battery endurance rating (81h)
- Refined foldable design and build quality
- Potentially superior image processing (based on Huawei's history)
- Older processor (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Lower peak display brightness (926 nits)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N5 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1188 nits compared to the Huawei Mate X3’s 926 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both feature infinite (nominal) contrast ratios, the higher peak brightness of the Find N5 provides a more dynamic and engaging viewing experience. The Find N5’s panel technology is likely LTPO, enabling variable refresh rates for improved power efficiency, a feature not explicitly stated for the Mate X3. Bezels are comparable, but the brighter panel gives the Find N5 an edge in overall visual quality.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given Huawei’s historical strength in mobile photography, the Mate X3 likely offers a more refined image processing pipeline. However, without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera performance. The absence of detail suggests neither phone prioritizes a groundbreaking camera system, focusing instead on the foldable form factor and core performance.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Oppo Find N5’s Qualcomm SM8750-3-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) is a generation ahead of the Huawei Mate X3’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The 7-core CPU configuration (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 5x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) in the Find N5 offers a significant uplift in both single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Mate X3’s Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510). The 3nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite also provides better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Mate X3’s 4G connectivity is also a limitation in areas with 5G infrastructure.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate X3 claims an endurance rating of 81 hours, while the Oppo Find N5 achieves 13:16 hours of active use. While the endurance rating is a standardized test, the active use score provides a more realistic measure of real-world battery life. The Find N5 compensates for potentially lower endurance with significantly faster charging: 80W wired (100% in 50 minutes) and 50W wireless, compared to the Mate X3’s 66W wired and 50W wireless. The Find N5 also offers reverse wired charging, a feature the Mate X3 provides at a slower 7.5W.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find N5 if you prioritize raw performance, a brighter and more vibrant display, and the fastest charging speeds available. This phone is ideal for power users, gamers, and those who demand the latest technology. Buy the Huawei Mate X3 if you value established battery life, a potentially more refined software experience (depending on region), and a design focused on durability and a more mature foldable experience.