Oppo Find N2 vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: A Deep Dive into Foldable Innovation
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and battery endurance, the Oppo Find N2 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, coupled with a reported 83-hour endurance rating, provides a more reliable experience than the Razr+ 2025's 10:12 active use score, despite the latter's newer chipset.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find N2 | Motorola Razr+ 2025 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 23 | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) - folded, plastic front - unfolded, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus) or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 132.2 x 140.5 x 7.4 mmFolded: 132.2 x 72.6 x 14.6 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 233 g or 237 g (8.22 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Stylus support | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1792 x 1920 pixels (~370 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.1 inches, 162.2 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.54 inches, 1080 x 2120 pixels, 18:9 ratio 1000 nits (HBM), 1350 nits (peak) | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/2", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14" | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (Dolby support) | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 37% in 10 min, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wired | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, White | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | PGU110 | XT2451-1 |
| Price | About 1100 EUR | $ 500.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 83h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.9 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 962082 (v9) GeekBench: 3670 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Find N2
- Exceptional battery life (83h endurance)
- Faster wired charging (67W)
- Proven and stable Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Older chipset compared to the Razr+ 2025
- Lacks wireless charging
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- Potentially improved performance in demanding tasks
- Shorter battery life (10:12h active use)
- Slower wired charging (45W)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N2 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1216 nits, suggesting excellent outdoor visibility. While the Razr+ 2025’s display specifications are absent, Motorola typically focuses on color accuracy in its flagship devices. The Find N2’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio indicates a true black level, crucial for immersive viewing. The absence of LTPO information for the Razr+ 2025 raises questions about its adaptive refresh rate capabilities, potentially impacting battery life compared to a dynamically adjusting Find N2 panel.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Given Oppo’s strong camera reputation, the Find N2 likely benefits from sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Razr+ 2025’s camera performance will heavily rely on its sensor size and lens apertures, information currently unavailable. Without these details, it’s difficult to assess the Razr+ 2025’s low-light performance or dynamic range capabilities relative to the Find N2. The absence of information suggests neither phone features a standout, high-megapixel sensor.
Performance
The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) represents a generational leap over the Oppo Find N2’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The 8s Gen 3 features the newer Cortex-X4 prime core and Cortex-A720 performance cores, promising improved single-core and multi-core performance. However, the 8+ Gen 1 is a highly optimized chip, known for its thermal efficiency. The Razr+ 2025’s CPU configuration (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) suggests a focus on sustained performance, while the Find N2’s (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) prioritizes a balance between power and efficiency. The impact of these architectural differences will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N2’s 83-hour endurance rating is a significant advantage, indicating exceptional battery life under typical usage. The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s 10:12 active use score, while respectable, falls short of the Find N2’s longevity. The Find N2’s 67W wired charging is considerably faster than the Razr+ 2025’s 45W, allowing for a 37% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. The Razr+ 2025 offers 15W wireless charging, a convenience the Find N2 lacks, but the slower charging speed is a trade-off.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find N2 if you need exceptional battery life and a proven, stable software experience. It’s ideal for users who prioritize longevity and consistent performance over the latest features. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you prefer a more modern chipset and are willing to trade some battery endurance for potential future software optimizations and the benefits of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s architecture.