Oppo Find N vs Xiaomi Poco F5: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 offers incredible value with its blazing-fast charging, powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, and impressive battery life. The Find N, however, provides a unique foldable experience and premium build. For most users, the Poco F5 wins on price and performance, while the Find N caters to those seeking innovation.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find N | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 15 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 17 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) - folded, plastic front - unfolded, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 132.6 x 140.2 x 8.0 mmFolded: 132.6 x 73 x 15.9 mm | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 275 g (9.70 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1792 x 1920 pixels (~370 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.1 inches, 162.2 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.49 inches, 988 x 1972 pixels, 18:9 ratio | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 55% in 30 min, 100% in 70 min 15W wireless 10W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | PEUM00 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 1070 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 90h | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.7 LUFS (Average) | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 703131 (v8), 822513 (v9) GeekBench: 3478 (v5.1) GFXBench: 51fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Find N
- Foldable Design
- Premium Build Quality
- Potentially Versatile Camera System
- Higher Price
- Older Chipset (Snapdragon 888)
- Slower Charging
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Excellent Value
- Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Fast 67W Charging
- Long Battery Life
- Less Premium Design
- Camera Details Unavailable
- No Foldable Feature
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a measured peak brightness of 963 nits, making it excellent for outdoor visibility. Both phones claim an 'infinite' contrast ratio, which is a nominal value. The Find N's foldable display offers a unique aspect ratio and multitasking capabilities, while the Poco F5 provides a more traditional, vibrant experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Based on general knowledge, the Find N likely has a more versatile camera system due to its foldable form factor and potentially higher-resolution sensors. The Poco F5 will likely offer good image quality for its price range.
Performance
The Oppo Find N's Snapdragon 888 is still a capable chip, but the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 offers a noticeable performance boost, especially in graphics-intensive tasks. The Poco F5's newer architecture and improved efficiency give it an edge in sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 shines here. While the Find N boasts an impressive endurance rating of 90h, the Poco F5's active use score of 11:52h and endurance rating of 118h, combined with its 67W charging, provide significantly faster charging and potentially longer real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Find N? Users seeking a foldable phone with a premium design and are willing to pay a premium price. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5? Budget-conscious users who prioritize performance, fast charging, and a vibrant display without breaking the bank.