Oppo Find N vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 3: A Deep Dive into Foldable Flagships

The foldable phone market is maturing, and the Oppo Find N and Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 represent two distinct approaches to the form factor. The Find N, leveraging the Snapdragon 888, offers a more established, albeit older, foldable experience. The Mix Fold 3, powered by the newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, aims to push the boundaries of performance and features. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which foldable best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly improved performance and efficiency, complemented by faster 67W wired and 50W wireless charging. While the Oppo Find N offers a respectable experience, the Mix Fold 3’s advancements justify the price premium.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Find N Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -
Launch
Announced2021, December 152023, August 14
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, December 17Available. Released 2023, August 14
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) - folded, plastic front - unfolded, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frameGlass front (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back or aramid fiber back, aluminum frame
DimensionsUnfolded: 132.6 x 140.2 x 8.0 mmFolded: 132.6 x 73 x 15.9 mmUnfolded: 161.2 x 143.3 x 5.3 mm Folded: 161.2 x 73.5 x 10.9 mm
SIMDual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight275 g (9.70 oz)255 g or 259 g (8.99 oz)
Display
Resolution1792 x 1920 pixels (~370 ppi density)1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density)
Size7.1 inches, 162.2 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio)8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak)Foldable LTPO OLED+, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak)
 Cover display: AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.49 inches, 988 x 1972 pixels, 18:9 ratio-
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 740
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
 UFS 3.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 10 MP, f/2.9, 115mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm-
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm-
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, Dolby Vision HDR
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaHDR, panorama
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm20 MP, f/2.3, 23mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.8µm Cover camera: 20 MP, f/2.3, 23mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack No-
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band (tri-band after future SW update)
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging33W wired, 55% in 30 min, 100% in 70 min 15W wireless 10W reverse wired67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 40 min 50W wireless, 100% in 55 min
TypeLi-Po 4500 mAhLi-Po 4800 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, PurpleBlack, Gold
ModelsPEUM002308CPXD0C
PriceAbout 1070 EURAbout 1150 EUR
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 90h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)-
Loudspeaker -28.7 LUFS (Average) -
Performance AnTuTu: 703131 (v8), 822513 (v9) GeekBench: 3478 (v5.1) GFXBench: 51fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)-

Oppo Find N

  • Potentially more compact form factor (unconfirmed)
  • Established foldable design
  • Lower price point (likely)

  • Older Snapdragon 888 chipset
  • Slower charging speeds
  • Lower battery endurance

Xiaomi Mix Fold 3

  • Significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
  • Faster 67W wired and 50W wireless charging
  • Brighter display with 1277 nits peak brightness
  • Longer battery endurance (117 hours)

  • Potentially larger and heavier design
  • Higher price point
  • May require more careful handling due to larger screen

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1277 nits peak brightness compared to the Oppo Find N’s ‘Infinite’ (nominal) contrast ratio, which doesn’t specify peak brightness. This translates to better outdoor visibility for the Mix Fold 3. While both are likely to utilize LTPO technology for variable refresh rates (a common feature in this segment, though not explicitly stated), the Mix Fold 3’s higher brightness is a clear advantage. The lack of specific display specs for the Find N makes a detailed comparison challenging, but the Mix Fold 3’s measured brightness is a tangible benefit.

Camera Comparison

Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific camera details. Given Xiaomi’s recent focus on camera technology, it’s reasonable to assume the Mix Fold 3 incorporates a more advanced camera system, potentially with larger sensors and improved image processing. The Oppo Find N, while capable, likely relies on older sensor technology. Without detailed specifications, a definitive camera comparison is impossible, but Xiaomi’s brand trajectory suggests a more sophisticated camera experience on the Mix Fold 3.

Performance

The performance gap between the Oppo Find N’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) and the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is substantial. The Gen 2 features a newer CPU architecture – Cortex-X3 vs Cortex-X1 – and a more efficient 4nm process. This results in a significant performance uplift in both CPU and GPU tasks. The Mix Fold 3’s CPU configuration (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) is demonstrably faster than the Find N’s (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and power users will overwhelmingly benefit from the Mix Fold 3’s superior processing power.

Battery Life

The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 offers a more compelling battery and charging solution. Its endurance rating of 117 hours surpasses the Oppo Find N’s 90 hours. Crucially, the Mix Fold 3 supports 67W wired charging (100% in 40 minutes) and 50W wireless charging (100% in 55 minutes), significantly faster than the Find N’s 33W wired (70 minutes) and 15W wireless. While the Find N’s battery life is respectable, the Mix Fold 3’s combination of longer endurance and faster charging provides a more convenient and efficient user experience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Find N if you prioritize a more compact foldable design and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset. It’s a solid option for those seeking a reliable foldable experience without the absolute latest technology. Buy the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 if you demand top-tier performance, faster charging speeds, and a brighter, more vibrant display. It’s the ideal choice for power users and those who want the best foldable experience currently available.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 get noticeably warmer than the Snapdragon 888 in the Oppo Find N during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is more powerful, its 4nm process is significantly more efficient. This means it generates less heat for the same level of performance compared to the Snapdragon 888’s 5nm process. The Mix Fold 3 is likely to maintain higher sustained performance with less thermal throttling during long gaming sessions.
❓ How does the hinge durability compare between the Oppo Find N and the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
Hinge durability is a critical factor for foldable phones. While both manufacturers claim rigorous testing, Xiaomi has a more recent track record of improving hinge designs with each generation of Mix Fold. The Find N’s hinge, while well-regarded at launch, is based on an older design. Long-term durability data is still emerging for both devices, but Xiaomi’s iterative improvements suggest a potentially more robust hinge.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 33W and 67W truly noticeable in everyday use with the Oppo Find N and Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
Absolutely. The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3’s 67W charging can top up the battery from 0-100% in approximately 40 minutes, while the Oppo Find N takes around 70 minutes. This 30-minute difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly recharge their devices, especially during busy days.