Oppo Find N vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find N boasts superior battery life and a potentially better display contrast, while the Z Fold3 offers a brighter screen and more established software support. The Find N is a compelling alternative for those prioritizing battery and display, while the Z Fold3 remains a strong choice with Samsung's ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find N | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 15 | 2021, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 17 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) - folded, plastic front - unfolded, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 132.6 x 140.2 x 8.0 mmFolded: 132.6 x 73 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 158.2 x 128.1 x 6.4 mmFolded: 158.2 x 67.1 x 14.4-16 mm |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 275 g (9.70 oz) | 271 g (9.56 oz) |
| - | IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) Stylus support | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1792 x 1920 pixels (~370 ppi density) | 1768 x 2208 pixels (~374 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.1 inches, 162.2 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.6 inches, 179.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak) | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.49 inches, 988 x 1972 pixels, 18:9 ratio | Cover display: Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 6.2 inches, 832 x 2268 pixels, 25:9 ratio | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, 12mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps (gyro-EIS), HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 4 MP, f/1.8, 2.0µm, under display Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 55% in 30 min, 100% in 70 min 15W wireless 10W reverse wired | 25W wired 11W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Phantom Black, Phantom Silver, Phantom Green, Thom Browne Edition, Wooyoungmi Edition |
| Models | PEUM00 | SM-F926B, SM-F926B/DS, SM-F926U, SM-F926U1, SM-F926W, SM-F9260, SM-F926N |
| Price | About 1070 EUR | € 453.57 / $ 367.74 / £ 449.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.73 W/kg (head) 1.22 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.04 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 90h | Endurance rating 75h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.7 LUFS (Average) | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 703131 (v8), 822513 (v9) GeekBench: 3478 (v5.1) GFXBench: 51fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 635918 (v8), 752218 (v9) GeekBench: 12719 (v4.4), 3239 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find N
- Exceptional Battery Life (90h Endurance)
- Potentially Superior Display Contrast
- Faster Wired Charging (33W)
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Less Established Software Ecosystem
- Camera details are limited
- Under-display camera quality may be lower
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
- Brighter Display (922 nits)
- Established Samsung Ecosystem & Software Support
- Versatile Camera System
- Adaptive 120Hz Refresh Rate
- Shorter Battery Life (75h Endurance)
- Slower Wired Charging (25W)
- Reverse Wireless Charging only
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting exceptional blacks and vibrant colors, though this is a nominal claim. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, on the other hand, offers a measured 922 nits max brightness, making it significantly more usable outdoors. Both utilize dynamic AMOLED technology, promising excellent color accuracy and viewing angles. The Z Fold3's adaptive refresh rate (120Hz) is a key advantage for smooth scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse in the provided data. However, based on general knowledge, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 typically offers a more versatile camera system with better image processing and software features. The Z Fold3's under-display camera is also a notable feature, though image quality is generally lower than the main cameras. The Find N's camera performance is likely competitive but may lack some of Samsung's advanced features.
Performance
Both devices share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G chipset and CPU configuration, ensuring comparable performance in everyday tasks and demanding games. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal, depending on software optimization and thermal management.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N shines in this category, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 90 hours, significantly outperforming the Z Fold3's 75 hours. While charging speeds are decent on both, the Find N's 33W wired charging is faster than the Z Fold3's 25W.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Find N is ideal for users who prioritize long battery life, a potentially superior display experience, and are comfortable with a slightly less mature software ecosystem. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G is best suited for those deeply invested in the Samsung ecosystem, needing a brighter display, and valuing the established software support and features.