Oppo Find N vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Foldable Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the Oppo Find N emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 888, coupled with a reported 90-hour endurance rating, provides a more robust experience than the Galaxy Z Flip 5G's Snapdragon 865+ and slower 15W charging. However, the Z Flip 5G's brand recognition and potentially more refined software experience may appeal to some.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find N | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International, Canada |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78, 79 Sub6 - China, Hong Kong |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 41, 66, 71 Sub6 - Canada | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 15 | 2020, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 17 | Available. Released 2020, August 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) - folded, plastic front - unfolded, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Plastic front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 132.6 x 140.2 x 8.0 mmFolded: 132.6 x 73 x 15.9 mm | Unfolded: 167.3 x 73.6 x 7.2 mm Folded: 87.4 x 73.6 x 17.3 mm |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 275 g (9.70 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1792 x 1920 pixels (~370 ppi density) | 1080 x 2636 pixels (~425 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.1 inches, 162.2 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 101.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak) | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ |
| Cover display: AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.49 inches, 988 x 1972 pixels, 18:9 ratio | Cover display: Super AMOLED, 1.1 inches, 112 x 300 pixels | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.09 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 55% in 30 min, 100% in 70 min 15W wireless 10W reverse wired | 15W wired 9W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 3300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Mystic Grey, Mystic Bronze, Mystic White |
| Models | PEUM00 | SM-F707B, SM-F707N, SM-F7070, SM-F707U, SM-F707U1, SM-F707W |
| Price | About 1070 EUR | About 800 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 1.01 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 90h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.7 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 703131 (v8), 822513 (v9) GeekBench: 3478 (v5.1) GFXBench: 51fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Find N
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Significantly better battery endurance (90h)
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Limited display specifications available
- Less established brand recognition in some markets
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G
- Sleek and compact design
- Established brand and software ecosystem
- 120Hz display refresh rate
- Older Snapdragon 865+ processor
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Potentially lower battery life
Display Comparison
Both devices feature foldable displays, but detailed specifications beyond 'infinite' contrast ratio are lacking for the Oppo Find N. The Z Flip 5G's display, while innovative, is known to have a noticeable crease. The Snapdragon 888 in the Find N likely has a more capable ISP for display processing, potentially leading to more accurate color reproduction. The lack of refresh rate information for the Find N is a significant omission, while the Z Flip 5G is known to have a 120Hz display. This gives the Z Flip 5G an edge in smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed with simply 'Photo / Video' capabilities, making a detailed comparison difficult. However, given Oppo’s strong camera reputation, it’s reasonable to assume the Find N features a more sophisticated camera system. The Snapdragon 888’s ISP is also more advanced, potentially leading to better image processing. The Z Flip 5G’s camera performance is generally considered good, but not class-leading. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Oppo’s track record suggests a more competitive camera experience.
Performance
The Oppo Find N's Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) represents a clear generational advantage over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's Snapdragon 865 5G+. The 5nm process node of the 888 translates to improved thermal efficiency and higher transistor density, resulting in better sustained performance. The 888's CPU configuration – a Cortex-X1 prime core alongside three A78 cores – offers a performance uplift compared to the Z Flip 5G’s Cortex-A77 setup. While both utilize the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the 888’s superior architecture will benefit multitasking and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N boasts an endurance rating of 90 hours, a significant advantage over the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, which lacks a published endurance rating. While the Z Flip 5G offers 15W wired and 9W wireless charging, the Find N supports 33W wired charging, reaching 55% in 30 minutes and 100% in 70 minutes, alongside 15W wireless and 10W reverse wired charging. This faster charging capability, combined with the superior endurance rating, makes the Find N the clear winner in battery performance. The Z Flip 5G’s slower charging speeds and smaller battery capacity will require more frequent top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find N if you need a foldable that can handle demanding tasks like gaming and video editing without significant throttling, and if long battery life is a priority. You'll benefit from the more powerful Snapdragon 888 and faster charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G if you prefer a more established brand with a potentially smoother software experience, and if you prioritize a sleek, minimalist design over raw performance and battery longevity.