Oppo Find N vs Google Pixel Fold: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off

Foldable phones are no longer a futuristic fantasy; they're here. The Oppo Find N and Google Pixel Fold represent two distinct approaches to this innovative form factor. But which one offers the better experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Oppo Find N boasts a superior battery life and faster charging, while the Pixel Fold shines with Google's software and Tensor G2 chip. The Find N offers a more compact and arguably more refined folding experience, but the Pixel Fold's software integration is a significant draw.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Find N Google Pixel Fold
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2021, December 152023, May 10
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, December 17Available. Released 2023, June 27
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) - folded, plastic front - unfolded, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame
DimensionsUnfolded: 132.6 x 140.2 x 8.0 mmFolded: 132.6 x 73 x 15.9 mmUnfolded: 139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 mmFolded: 139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 mm
SIMDual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)Nano-SIM + eSIM
Weight275 g (9.70 oz)283 g (9.98 oz)
 -IPX8 water resistant
Display
Resolution1792 x 1920 pixels (~370 ppi density)1840 x 2208 pixels (~378 ppi density)
Size7.1 inches, 162.2 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio)7.6 inches, 183.3 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak)Foldable OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak)
 Cover display: AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.49 inches, 988 x 1972 pixels, 18:9 ratioCover display: OLED, 120Hz, HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.8 inches, 1080 x 2092 pixels, 17.4:9 ratio, 408 ppi 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)
GPUAdreno 660Mali-G710 MP7
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm-
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.25µm
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaHDR, panorama
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Cover camera: 9.5 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
 -Ultra Wideband (UWB) support
Battery
Charging33W wired, 55% in 30 min, 100% in 70 min 15W wireless 10W reverse wiredWired, PD3.0 Wireless
TypeLi-Po 4500 mAhLi-Po 4821 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, PurplePorcelain, Obsidian
ModelsPEUM00G9FPL
PriceAbout 1070 EUR€ 670.87 / $ 389.26 / £ 899.99
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 90h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)-
Loudspeaker -28.7 LUFS (Average) -
Performance AnTuTu: 703131 (v8), 822513 (v9) GeekBench: 3478 (v5.1) GFXBench: 51fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)-

Oppo Find N

  • Exceptional battery life
  • Faster charging speeds
  • More compact design
  • Potentially smoother hardware

  • Older Snapdragon 888 chipset
  • Limited camera details
  • Software support potentially less robust than Pixel

Google Pixel Fold

  • Google Tensor G2 chip for AI tasks
  • Excellent camera with Google's image processing
  • Seamless Google services integration
  • Wider external display

  • Unknown battery life
  • Slower charging speeds (likely)
  • Potentially larger and heavier
  • Price likely higher

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find N features a reported 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term, but suggesting excellent blacks) and a more compact external display. The Pixel Fold's display is generally well-regarded, but specifics on contrast ratio are unavailable. The Find N's internal display is known for its minimal crease, a key advantage. The Pixel Fold's external display is wider, offering more usability when folded.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Pixel Fold leverages Google's renowned image processing. The Pixel Fold is expected to deliver consistently excellent photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Oppo Find N's camera is good, but may not match the Pixel's computational photography prowess. Specific camera specs for the Find N are limited in the provided data.

Performance

The Oppo Find N utilizes the Snapdragon 888, a powerful chip but now a generation behind. The Google Pixel Fold's Tensor G2 is optimized for Google's AI and machine learning tasks, providing a smooth and responsive experience, particularly in camera and assistant features. While the Snapdragon 888 is still capable, the Tensor G2 likely holds a slight edge in sustained performance and AI-driven tasks.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find N's 90-hour endurance rating is exceptionally impressive, suggesting significantly better battery life than the Pixel Fold. The Find N also features faster wired and wireless charging speeds. The Pixel Fold's charging speeds are unknown, but likely slower than the Find N.

Buying Guide

The Oppo Find N is ideal for users prioritizing battery life, a more compact foldable design, and a potentially smoother hardware experience. The Google Pixel Fold is best suited for Android purists, photography enthusiasts who value Google's image processing, and those seeking seamless integration with Google services.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which foldable phone has better battery life?
Based on the provided data, the Oppo Find N has significantly better battery life with a 90-hour endurance rating.
❓ Is the Google Pixel Fold worth the extra cost?
It depends on your priorities. If you value Google's software, camera capabilities, and AI features, the Pixel Fold is likely worth the investment. If battery life and a more compact design are paramount, the Find N might be a better choice.