Oppo Find 7a vs Samsung Galaxy S9: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is the clear winner. While the Find 7a offered great value initially, the S9's superior display, more powerful chipset, and refined camera experience make it the better choice, even considering its age. The S9's endurance rating is also slightly better.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find 7a | Samsung Galaxy S9 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all models | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - international model | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20 - International model | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| LTE 700 / 1700 / 2100 - Mexico & US model | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2014, March. Released 2014, March | 2018, February 25. Released 2018, March 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 152.6 x 75 x 9.2 mm (6.01 x 2.95 x 0.36 in) | 147.7 x 68.7 x 8.5 mm (5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 163 g (5.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1440 x 2960 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~570 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~72.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.8 inches, 84.8 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, HDR10 |
| - | 3D Touch (home button only) Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.3 GHz Krait 400 | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Mongoose M3 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEAOcta-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) - USA/LATAM, China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8974AB Snapdragon 801 (28 nm) | Exynos 9810 (10 nm) - EMEAQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) - USA/LATAM, China |
| GPU | Adreno 330 | Mali-G72 MP18 - EMEAAdreno 630 - USA/LATAM, China |
| OS | Android 4.3 (Jelly Bean), ColorOS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, One UI 2.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.0 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3", AF | 12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 720p@120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS (30fps) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.22µm, AF 2 MP (dedicated iris scanner camera) |
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (USA & Canada only) |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Iris scanner, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| - | ANT+ Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, 75% in 30 min (advertised) | 15W wired, QC2 Wireless (Qi) (market dependent) |
| Type | Li-Po 2800 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable (11.55 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black | Midnight Black, Coral Blue, Titanium Gray, Lilac Purple, Burgundy Red, Sunrise Gold, Ice Blue |
| Models | X9006 | SM-G960F, SM-G960, SM-G960F, SM-G960U, SM-G960W, SM-G9600, SM-G960U1, SM-G960N, SCV38, SM-G960X, SC-02K |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.63 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -92.7dB / Crosstalk -92.0dB | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -93.9dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 60h | Endurance rating 78h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 852 (nominal), 2.279 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.630 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 71dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 75dB | Voice 68dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 81dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 250156 (v7) GeekBench: 8830 (v4.4) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find 7a
- Good value for its time
- Decent performance for casual use
- Impressive battery life (60h)
- Outdated chipset
- Inferior display
- Less capable camera
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S9
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Powerful processor
- Excellent camera
- Good battery life (78h)
- Wireless charging (market dependent)
- Older device
- May lack latest software updates
- Battery degradation possible
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S9 takes a commanding lead in the display department. Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (effectively near-black levels) and 4.630 sunlight readability far surpass the Find 7a's 852 (nominal) and 2.279 (sunlight) contrast. The S9's AMOLED technology delivers richer colors and deeper blacks, providing a more immersive viewing experience. The Find 7a's display was good for its time, but it simply can't compete.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy S9's camera is generally considered superior. While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the S9 boasts better image processing, low-light performance, and features like a variable aperture. The Find 7a's camera was decent, but the S9's advancements in image quality are undeniable.
Performance
The Galaxy S9's Exynos 9810 (or Snapdragon 845 in some regions) is significantly faster than the Find 7a's Snapdragon 801. The S9's octa-core processor and 10nm manufacturing process offer a noticeable performance boost in everyday tasks and demanding games. While the Find 7a's quad-core processor was capable, it shows its age compared to the S9's more modern architecture.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive endurance ratings (60h vs 78h). However, the Galaxy S9 edges out the Oppo Find 7a in battery life, likely due to more efficient components and software optimization. The S9 also supports wireless charging (market dependent), a feature absent in the Find 7a.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Find 7a? Budget-conscious users looking for a nostalgic Android experience. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy S9? Users prioritizing a vibrant display, smooth performance, and a capable camera, willing to accept an older device.