Oppo has a history of producing compelling smartphones, and the Find 7 and Reno 10x Zoom represent different eras of their innovation. The Find 7 was a flagship of its time, boasting a stunning display, while the Reno 10x Zoom focused on camera capabilities and modern performance. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone holds up best today.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom is the clear winner. While the Find 7 had a remarkable display for its time, the Reno 10x Zoom’s Snapdragon 855 chipset, vastly improved camera system, and significantly longer battery life make it a more compelling choice in 2024.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all models | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - international model | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20 - International model | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | LTE 700 / 1700 / 2100 - Mexico & US model | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2014, March. Released 2014, May | 2019, April. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 152.6 x 75 x 9.2 mm (6.01 x 2.95 x 0.36 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~534 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~72.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.5 GHz Krait 400 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8974AC Snapdragon 801 (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 330 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 4.3 (Jelly Bean), ColorOS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3", AF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 720p@120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, 75% in 30 min (advertised) | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black, Astro Black | Ocean Green, Jet Black, Mist Pink, Ocean Blue |
| Models | X9076, X9007 | CPH1919, PCCM00 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 1020 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -93.8dB / Crosstalk -94.4dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 44h
|
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1123:1 (nominal), 1.691 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 69dB / Noise 70dB / Ring 75dB
|
-24.7 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
Basemark X: 14968 |
AnTuTu: 364220 (v7), 407473 (v8)
GeekBench: 10395 (v4.4), 2103 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find 7
- Excellent display for its time
- Fast charging (advertised)
- Compact size
- Outdated chipset
- Short battery life
- Limited software support
- Camera is dated
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- Powerful Snapdragon 855 chipset
- Exceptional camera with 10x zoom
- Long battery life
- Modern design
- Brighter Display
- 20W charging is slower than some modern phones
- Design can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find 7's display was revolutionary with its 1123:1 contrast ratio (nominal) and impressive sunlight readability. However, the Reno 10x Zoom, while not boasting such a high nominal contrast, offers a brighter 440 nits max brightness, providing better visibility in various lighting conditions. The Reno 10x Zoom's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but the overall viewing experience is more modern.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Reno 10x Zoom's camera system is far superior. The 10x optical zoom is a standout feature, allowing for incredible detail and versatility. Image processing and low-light performance are also significantly better on the Reno 10x Zoom.
Performance
The Reno 10x Zoom's Snapdragon 855 chipset is a significant upgrade over the Find 7's Snapdragon 801. The 7nm process and octa-core architecture deliver substantially faster performance and improved efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking, quicker app loading, and better gaming performance on the Reno 10x Zoom.
Battery Life
The Reno 10x Zoom dominates in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 107h compared to the Find 7's 44h. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges, making the Reno 10x Zoom a more practical choice for daily use.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Find 7 is best suited for enthusiasts seeking a nostalgic experience with a fantastic display and a taste of older Android. The Reno 10x Zoom is ideal for users prioritizing camera quality, performance, and extended battery life in a modern smartphone package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Find 7 still worth buying?
Only if you're a collector or specifically want to experience a phone from that era. Its age limits its practicality.
❓ What is the main advantage of the Reno 10x Zoom over the Find 7?
The Reno 10x Zoom offers significantly better performance, a vastly superior camera system, and much longer battery life.
❓ How does the charging speed compare?
Both phones offer 20W wired charging, which is relatively slow by today's standards. The Find 7's advertised 75% charge in 30 minutes may not be entirely accurate in real-world usage.
