The Oppo Find 5 and LG Optimus G Pro E985 represent a fascinating point in Android history – the rise of powerful, yet relatively affordable, flagship devices. Both phones leveraged Qualcomm’s Snapdragon S4 Pro platform, but differed in execution, particularly in display technology and battery optimization. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which phone holds up better under scrutiny.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the LG Optimus G Pro E985 emerges as the better choice. Its 50-hour endurance rating, a 17% improvement over the Oppo Find 5’s 43 hours, provides a tangible benefit in daily use. While both share the same core chipset, the G Pro’s optimizations deliver a more consistently usable experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - E985, E986 |
| 4G bands | - | 3, 7 - E988 |
| Speed | HSPA | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat3 100/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | LTE 800 / 1800 / 2600 - E986 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2012, December. Released 2013, February | 2013, February. Released 2013, April |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 141.8 x 68.8 x 8.9 mm (5.58 x 2.71 x 0.35 in) | 150.2 x 76.1 x 9.4 mm (5.91 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~441 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~73.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | True Full HD IPS Plus LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Krait | Quad-core 1.7 GHz Krait 300 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm APQ8064 Snapdragon S4 Pro | Qualcomm APQ8064T Snapdragon S4 Pro |
| GPU | Adreno 320 | Adreno 320 |
| OS | Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) | Android 4.1.2 (Jelly Bean), upgradable to 4.4.2 (KitKat), LG Optimus UI 3 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 1.9 MP | 2.1 MP |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP, aptX |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, S-GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 (SlimPort), OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 598 h (2G) / Up to 550 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 31 h (2G) / Up to 21 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 2500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3140 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black | Black, White |
| Models | - | F240, E980, LS980, E988, E986, F240L, F240S, F240K |
| Price | About 540 EUR | About 400 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.64 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.32 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -81.7dB / Crosstalk -80.7dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 50h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1489:1 (nominal) / 1.552:1 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 72dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 72dB
|
Oppo Find 5
- Slightly higher nominal display contrast ratio.
- Competitive price point at launch.
- Clean Android experience (likely).
- Lower battery endurance (43h).
- Slower CPU clock speed.
- Poorer sunlight readability.
LG Optimus G Pro E985
- Superior battery endurance (50h).
- Faster CPU clock speed (1.7 GHz).
- Better sunlight readability.
- Potentially higher price at launch.
- May run a more heavily customized Android skin.
- Slightly lower nominal display contrast ratio.
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Find 5 and LG Optimus G Pro feature displays aiming for vibrant visuals, but diverge in their execution. The LG G Pro boasts a significantly higher nominal contrast ratio of 1489:1 compared to the Find 5’s 1107:1, suggesting deeper blacks and more punchy colors. Crucially, the G Pro also excels in sunlight readability with a contrast ratio of 1.552:1, outperforming the Find 5’s 2.088:1. This means the G Pro’s screen remains more visible under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD technology, the LG’s panel appears to be more effectively tuned for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both the Oppo Find 5 and LG Optimus G Pro offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor specifications are absent. Without knowing sensor size, aperture, or pixel binning techniques, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. However, the market positioning of both phones suggests a focus on image quality. The LG G Pro, being a slightly more premium offering, may have benefited from more advanced image processing algorithms or a slightly larger sensor. The absence of information regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a significant omission, as its presence would heavily favor one device over the other.
Performance
At the heart of both devices lies the Qualcomm APQ8064 Snapdragon S4 Pro, but the LG Optimus G Pro E985 features a slightly overclocked CPU running at 1.7 GHz compared to the Find 5’s 1.5 GHz Krait cores. This 14% clock speed increase translates to a modest performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. However, both phones share the same Adreno 320 GPU, meaning graphics performance will be largely identical. The impact of this CPU difference is likely to be most noticeable in multitasking and app loading times, rather than demanding games. Thermal management, a critical factor with the S4 Pro, is not detailed in the provided data, but the G Pro’s slightly higher clock speed could potentially lead to more heat generation under sustained load.
Battery Life
The LG Optimus G Pro E985 clearly wins in battery endurance, achieving a 50-hour rating versus the Oppo Find 5’s 43 hours. This 17% advantage is substantial and translates to a noticeable difference in real-world usage. While battery capacity (mAh) isn’t specified, the endurance rating accounts for both capacity and power efficiency. The G Pro’s superior endurance suggests more efficient power management, potentially through software optimizations or a more efficient display panel. The lack of charging wattage data prevents a comparison of charging speeds, but the G Pro’s longer runtime mitigates the importance of fast charging to some extent.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find 5 if you prioritize a slightly higher nominal display contrast ratio and are comfortable with potentially shorter battery life. It’s a good option for users who frequently use external power sources. Buy the LG Optimus G Pro E985 if you value extended battery life, a superior sunlight readability score, and a marginally faster processor, making it ideal for users who demand all-day performance without constant charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the 1.7 GHz CPU in the LG Optimus G Pro E985 a significant upgrade over the 1.5 GHz CPU in the Oppo Find 5?
While a 14% clock speed increase is measurable, the real-world impact is likely to be subtle. Both phones utilize the same Snapdragon S4 Pro architecture, so the core performance is similar. The G Pro will likely exhibit faster app loading times and smoother multitasking, but the difference won't be dramatic in most everyday tasks.
❓ Given the age of these phones, are the batteries still reliable in the LG Optimus G Pro E985?
Battery degradation is a significant concern with phones this old. While the G Pro initially boasted a 50-hour endurance rating, a used device will likely experience significantly reduced battery life. Battery replacement is a viable option, but finding compatible batteries may be challenging.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
This information is not provided in the context data. However, based on the market segment and LG's historical practices, the Optimus G Pro is *likely* to support microSD card expansion, while the Oppo Find 5's support is less certain. Checking specific model variations is crucial.
