Oppo F5 Youth vs Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G: A Detailed Showdown

The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Oppo F5 Youth and the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G. Both promise a lot, but which one truly delivers?
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its 5G connectivity, more modern chipset (Dimensity 700), and impressive battery life outweigh the Oppo F5 Youth's older specs. While the F5 Youth might be cheaper, the Poco M3 Pro 5G offers a significantly better overall experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo F5 Youth Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands-1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2017, November. Released 2017, December2021, May 19
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, May 22
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum back, aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions156.5 x 76 x 7.5 mm (6.16 x 2.99 x 0.30 in)161.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight152 g (5.36 oz)190 g (6.70 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density)
Size6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~78.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ), 500 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core 2.5 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6763T Helio P23 (16 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)
GPUMali-G71 MP2Mali-G57 MC2
OSAndroid 7.1 (Nougat), ColorOS 3.2Android 11, MIUI 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1UFS 2.2
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/3.32", 1.0µm, PDAF8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Triple-48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging-18W wired
TypeLi-Ion 3200 mAh, non-removableLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGold, BlackPoco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue
ModelsCPH1725M2103K19PG, M2103K19PI, M2103K19PY
PriceAbout 280 EURAbout 140 EUR
SAR-0.94 W/kg (head)     1.06 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.54 W/kg (head)     0.90 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 121h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1475:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -27.9 LUFS (Good)
OUR TESTS
Battery (old)-Endurance rating 121h
Camera-Photo / Video
Display-1475:1 contrast ratio, 536 nits max brightness (measured)
Loudspeaker--27.9 LUFS (Good)

Oppo F5 Youth

  • Large Display
  • Potentially Lower Price
  • Decent Design

  • Outdated Chipset
  • Poor Performance
  • Short Battery Life
  • No 5G

Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G

  • 5G Connectivity
  • Modern Chipset (Dimensity 700)
  • Excellent Battery Life
  • Good Performance
  • Higher Brightness Display

  • Design may be less premium
  • Charging speed is relatively slow (18W)

Display Comparison

The Poco M3 Pro 5G boasts a higher measured brightness (536 nits) compared to the F5 Youth, offering better visibility in sunlight. Both have a nominal contrast ratio of 1475:1, suggesting excellent black levels. However, the Poco's display technology is likely more advanced, resulting in a slightly better viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

While both phones are marketed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Poco M3 Pro 5G likely has a more modern camera sensor and image processing algorithms. Expect better image quality, especially in low light, from the Poco. Specific camera specs are missing for both, making a definitive comparison difficult, but the Poco's newer hardware gives it an edge.

Performance

The Poco M3 Pro 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset (7nm) is significantly more powerful and efficient than the Oppo F5 Youth's Helio P23 (16nm). The Dimensity 700's octa-core CPU with Cortex-A76 cores provides a noticeable performance boost for gaming and multitasking. The F5 Youth will feel sluggish in comparison.

Battery Life

The Poco M3 Pro 5G shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 121 hours. This is exceptional. The Oppo F5 Youth's battery capacity is likely smaller, and its older chipset is less efficient, resulting in significantly shorter battery life.

Buying Guide

The Oppo F5 Youth is best suited for users on an extremely tight budget who prioritize a large display and don't need 5G. The Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G is ideal for those seeking a modern, 5G-enabled phone with good performance, a decent camera, and exceptional battery life without breaking the bank.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Oppo F5 Youth still worth buying in 2024?
Only if you're on an extremely tight budget and don't need 5G or modern performance. Otherwise, the Poco M3 Pro 5G offers significantly better value.
❓ What is the difference between the Helio P23 and the Dimensity 700?
The Dimensity 700 is a much newer and more powerful chipset built on a smaller (7nm) process, offering better performance and efficiency compared to the older (16nm) Helio P23.