The Oppo F31 and vivo V19 Neo represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The F31, powered by the newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300, aims for a performance advantage, while the V19 Neo relies on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 675 for a balance of efficiency and cost. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo F31 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset delivers noticeably faster performance, and the 80W charging is a game-changer. While the V19 Neo offers respectable battery life, it can't match the F31's speed or charging capabilities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 17 | 2020, June 13. Released 2020, June 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 75 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.5 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2372 pixels (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 105.0 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD
Reverse wired charging | 18W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Bloom Red, Cloud Green | Admiral Blue, Crystal White |
| Models | CPH2781 | - |
| Price | ₹ 23,999 | About 320 EUR |
| SAR | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F31
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 6300)
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- More efficient 6nm process node
- Potentially higher price point
- Display specs not provided, may be similar to V19 Neo
vivo V19 Neo
- More affordable price
- Decent battery life for light users
- Reliable Snapdragon 675 performance for basic tasks
- Slow 18W charging
- Older 11nm chipset is less efficient
- Performance lags behind the Oppo F31
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the market positioning, both likely feature FHD+ LCD panels. However, the F31, being a newer release, may benefit from slightly improved color accuracy and brightness. The V19 Neo, being older, may have wider bezels. The absence of high refresh rates is expected in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, the F31’s newer chipset likely includes a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The V19 Neo’s camera system is likely focused on providing adequate results for social media sharing, while the F31 may offer more flexibility and detail for enthusiasts. We can assume both phones include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the F31’s ISP could deliver more natural-looking results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F31’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) boasts a significantly more modern architecture than the vivo V19 Neo’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offer a substantial performance uplift over the Snapdragon 675’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. The 6nm process node also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling under sustained load. The Snapdragon 675, while capable, will struggle to keep pace with the F31 in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Oppo F31’s 80W wired charging is a standout feature, dwarfing the vivo V19 Neo’s 18W charging. This means the F31 can likely charge from 0-100% in under 40 minutes, while the V19 Neo will take considerably longer. The F31 also supports 33W PPS and 13.5W PD, offering wider compatibility with chargers. While the V19 Neo may have a slightly larger battery capacity (speculation based on typical market trends), the F31’s charging speed effectively mitigates any potential battery life disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F31 if you prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, or demanding applications, and if rapid charging is essential. Its 80W charging will minimize downtime. Buy the vivo V19 Neo if you value a more conservative power draw for extended battery life during light usage, and if you're on a tighter budget where maximizing value is paramount.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 6300 in the Oppo F31 handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile at high settings?
Yes, the Dimensity 6300 is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should comfortably run PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process node also helps mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How long does it actually take to fully charge the Oppo F31 with the 80W charger?
Oppo claims the F31 can charge from 0-100% in approximately 45-50 minutes with the 80W SuperVOOC charger. This is a significant improvement over the V19 Neo’s 18W charging, which would likely take over 2 hours for a full charge.
❓ Does the vivo V19 Neo support any form of fast charging, and is the included charger sufficient?
The vivo V19 Neo supports 18W fast charging, but it's considerably slower than the Oppo F31's 80W charging. The included charger is sufficient for 18W charging, but you won't experience the rapid charging speeds offered by the F31.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 675 in the V19 Neo still a viable option for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and video streaming?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 675 remains a capable processor for everyday tasks. It will handle browsing, social media, and video streaming without any noticeable lag. However, it will struggle with more demanding applications or heavy multitasking compared to the Dimensity 6300.
