The Oppo F31 Pro+ and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China variant) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this, primarily through chipset selection and charging technology. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term efficiency and faster charging, the Oppo F31 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, built on a 4nm process, offers superior power efficiency compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 6nm Dimensity 1100, translating to better battery life and potentially less thermal throttling during sustained use. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro remains a strong contender for those prioritizing raw CPU power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 16 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 16 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.6 x 7.7 mm or 7.9 mm | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 or 204 g (6.88 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 33W PPS, 42% in 20 min
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Festival Pink, Himalayan White, Gemstone Blue | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | CPH2757 | - |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F31 Pro+
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm)
- Potentially better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency
- CPU peak performance may be slightly lower than Dimensity 1100
- Camera specifications unknown, potential for compromise
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Strong CPU performance with Dimensity 1100
- 67W fast charging is still very competitive
- Likely features a high-refresh-rate AMOLED display
- Less power-efficient 6nm Dimensity 1100
- Longer full charge time compared to Oppo F31 Pro+
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Redmi Note 10 Pro's market positioning, it likely features a 120Hz AMOLED panel, common for the series. The Oppo F31 Pro+ likely follows suit. The key differentiator will be peak brightness and color calibration, areas where Oppo often excels. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume both offer vibrant and smooth viewing experiences, but Oppo may have a slight edge in color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, so analysis relies on brand tendencies. Xiaomi’s Redmi Note series often emphasizes high megapixel counts, but image processing is crucial. Oppo typically focuses on natural color reproduction and effective low-light performance. Without sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to definitively state which phone has the superior camera system. However, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is likely more advanced, potentially leading to better image quality and faster processing times. The absence of details makes a concrete comparison impossible, but Oppo's history suggests a focus on image quality over sheer megapixel count.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F31 Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with a 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core and three additional Cortex-A715 cores. This is paired with four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. Conversely, the Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) employs the MediaTek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) with a more traditional 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 performance core and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency core setup. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 provides a significant advantage in power efficiency, meaning less heat generation and potentially sustained performance for longer periods. While the Dimensity 1100’s Cortex-A78 cores offer strong peak performance, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s newer architecture and process node likely deliver a more balanced experience. The Snapdragon's architecture also suggests improved AI processing capabilities.
Battery Life
The Oppo F31 Pro+ boasts an impressive 80W wired charging capability, achieving 42% charge in just 20 minutes, alongside support for 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 33W PPS. This is significantly faster than the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W charging, which takes 42 minutes for a full charge. While the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s charging speed is still respectable, the Oppo’s 80W solution offers a substantial time saving. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s 4nm process also contributes to better battery efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity differences between the two devices (capacity not specified). The Oppo also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent from the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s specifications.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F31 Pro+ if you need a phone that balances performance with exceptional battery life and incredibly fast charging, making it ideal for power users and travelers. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prioritize maximum CPU performance for demanding tasks and are comfortable with slightly less efficient power consumption, and potentially longer full charge times.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1100 is a capable chip, but its 6nm process is less efficient than the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s 4nm node. This means the Redmi Note 10 Pro is more likely to experience thermal throttling during prolonged gaming, potentially leading to reduced frame rates and performance. The Oppo F31 Pro+ should maintain more consistent performance over longer periods.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Oppo F31 Pro+ compared to the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro in real-world use?
The Oppo F31 Pro+ can achieve a 42% charge in 20 minutes, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro takes 42 minutes for a full charge. This translates to a significant time saving, especially for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery. The Oppo's charging is demonstrably faster, offering convenience for those on the go.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 offer a noticeable improvement in AI processing compared to the Dimensity 1100?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 incorporates Qualcomm’s latest AI Engine, which is designed for improved on-device AI processing. This can translate to faster image processing, enhanced voice assistant capabilities, and more intelligent camera features compared to the Dimensity 1100.
