The mid-range 5G market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F31 Pro+ and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent compelling options. The A52s 5G, a proven performer, faces a new challenger in the F31 Pro+, which brings a newer chipset and significantly faster charging to the table. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value and experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo F31 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a performance edge, and the 80W charging is a game-changer. However, the Galaxy A52s 5G remains a strong contender for those prioritizing established reliability and potentially longer software support.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 16 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 16 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.6 x 7.7 mm or 7.9 mm | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 or 204 g (6.88 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 33W PPS, 42% in 20 min
10W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Festival Pink, Himalayan White, Gemstone Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | CPH2757 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 320 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F31 Pro+
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- Newer, more efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance due to 4nm process
- Versatile charging standards (PD, UFCS, PPS)
- Battery capacity not specified
- Brand recognition may be lower in some regions
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Proven battery endurance (113h rating)
- Established brand reputation and software support
- Good display brightness (800 nits)
- Reliable and consistent camera performance
- Slower 25W charging
- Older Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Less efficient 6nm process
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the Oppo F31 Pro+'s display specifications are not provided, it's reasonable to expect similar brightness levels given its market positioning. Both displays feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. The A52s 5G’s display is well-regarded for its color accuracy, and without specific data on the F31 Pro+, it’s difficult to assess if Oppo has matched or surpassed this. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests standard refresh rate management, impacting power consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Oppo F31 Pro+. The Galaxy A52s 5G’s camera performance is generally considered good, but its strength lies in consistent image processing rather than groundbreaking hardware. Without knowing the main sensor size or aperture of the F31 Pro+, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording, but this information is not provided. It's safe to assume both phones include a suite of software enhancements for image processing, but the underlying hardware will dictate the ultimate quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F31 Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm), while the Galaxy A52s 5G features the Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 4nm process of the 7 Gen 3 offers significant advantages in thermal efficiency and power consumption compared to the 6nm 778G. The F31 Pro+'s CPU configuration – 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 – suggests a focus on sustained performance, leveraging the newer Cortex-A715 architecture. The A52s 5G’s CPU – 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 – while capable, is a generation older. This translates to a noticeable performance uplift for the F31 Pro+ in demanding tasks and gaming.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The Oppo F31 Pro+’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 80W wired charging is a standout feature. This allows for a 42% charge in just 20 minutes, drastically reducing downtime. While the A52s 5G’s 25W charging is adequate, it pales in comparison. The F31 Pro+ also supports 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 33W PPS, offering versatile charging options. The faster charging of the F31 Pro+ effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F31 Pro+ if you prioritize fast charging, future-proofed performance with the newer Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, and are comfortable with a potentially less established brand in your region. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value a proven track record, excellent battery endurance, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s software support and established ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the Oppo F31 Pro+ offer a noticeable gaming improvement over the Snapdragon 778G in the Galaxy A52s 5G?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 provides a tangible gaming improvement. The newer CPU architecture and GPU, combined with the more efficient 4nm process, result in higher frame rates, smoother gameplay, and reduced thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the A52s 5G is capable of playing most games, the F31 Pro+ offers a more future-proof and enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Oppo F31 Pro+ with the 80W charger?
While the data states 42% in 20 minutes, a full 0-100% charge with the 80W charger is estimated to take around 35-40 minutes. This is a substantial improvement over the Galaxy A52s 5G’s 25W charging, which typically takes over an hour and a half for a full charge. The 80W charging is a key differentiator for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
❓ Is the software experience on the Oppo F31 Pro+ significantly different from Samsung's One UI on the Galaxy A52s 5G?
Yes, the software experience differs. Oppo's ColorOS, while feature-rich, has a distinct aesthetic and approach compared to Samsung's One UI. Samsung generally offers longer software support and more frequent updates, which is a consideration for long-term users. ColorOS has improved significantly in recent years, but One UI remains a more polished and widely recognized experience.
