Oppo F31 Pro+ vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo F31 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, promises better sustained performance and thermal management. The significantly faster 80W charging also provides a substantial convenience advantage, despite a potentially similar battery capacity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo F31 Pro+ | OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 16 | 2022, February 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 16 | Available. Released 2022, February 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.6 x 7.7 mm or 7.9 mm | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 or 204 g (6.88 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 33W PPS, 42% in 20 min 10W reverse wired | 65W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Festival Pink, Himalayan White, Gemstone Blue | Gray Mirror, Bahama Blue |
| Models | CPH2757 | IV2201 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | £ 99.00 / € 182.18 |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F31 Pro+
- Faster 80W charging for quicker top-ups
- More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Potentially better image processing with the newer ISP
- Software experience may be less refined than OnePlus
- Lack of detailed camera specifications
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
- Established OnePlus software ecosystem
- Potentially competitive pricing
- Reliable Dimensity 900 performance
- Slower 65W charging compared to Oppo
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 900 chipset
- Older CPU architecture
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely feature FHD+ AMOLED panels. The key differentiator will be peak brightness and color accuracy. OnePlus historically focuses on color science, while Oppo often prioritizes peak brightness for outdoor visibility. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume both offer acceptable viewing experiences, but the F31 Pro+’s potential for higher peak brightness, given its newer chipset and overall positioning, could give it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the chipset plays a role in image signal processing (ISP) capabilities. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s ISP is likely more advanced, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The absence of information on sensor sizes and OIS is critical; a larger sensor with OIS will significantly impact low-light performance. Assuming similar sensor sizes, the F31 Pro+'s superior ISP could provide a noticeable advantage in image quality. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F31 Pro+’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) boasts a more modern architecture – Cortex-A715 cores – compared to the OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G’s Dimensity 900 (6nm). The 4nm process node is crucial; it allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to less heat generation under load. While the Dimensity 900’s Cortex-A78 cores are capable, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s architecture is a generation newer and should deliver superior multi-core and single-core performance. This benefits users engaged in demanding applications and multitasking. The Snapdragon's GPU will also likely outperform the Dimensity's.
Battery Life
The Oppo F31 Pro+’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer. The stated 42% charge in 20 minutes is significantly faster than the Nord CE 2 5G’s 65W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The F31 Pro+ also supports PD, UFCS, and PPS charging standards, offering broader compatibility. The 10W reverse wired charging is a useful addition for topping up accessories. The Nord CE 2 5G’s 65W charging is still respectable, but the F31 Pro+ offers a clear advantage in charging convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F31 Pro+ if you prioritize sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G if you prefer a potentially more established software experience within the OnePlus ecosystem and are less concerned with pushing the absolute limits of processing power.