The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F31 Pro+ and Motorola Moto G60S represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The F31 Pro+ arrives with Qualcomm’s newer, more efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the G60S leverages the established MediaTek Helio G95. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo F31 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Moto G60S’s Helio G95, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the Moto G60S offers faster 50W charging, the F31 Pro+'s more powerful processor justifies the trade-off.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 40, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 16 | 2021, August 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 16 | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.6 x 7.7 mm or 7.9 mm | 169.7 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 or 204 g (6.88 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| | - | Water repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | - |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 562 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 33W PPS, 42% in 20 min
10W reverse wired | 50W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Festival Pink, Himalayan White, Gemstone Blue | Green, Blue |
| Models | CPH2757 | XT2133-2, XT2133-1 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F31 Pro+
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 7 Gen 3)
- More efficient 4nm fabrication process
- Versatile charging options (80W, PD, UFCS, PPS)
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Potentially slower 0-100% charge time compared to Moto G60S
- May be slightly more expensive
Motorola Moto G60S
- Faster 50W wired charging with QC4
- Potentially lower price point
- Solid performance for basic tasks
- Reliable brand reputation
- Less powerful processor (Helio G95)
- Less efficient 12nm fabrication process
- Limited charging standard support
- Inferior image processing
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) are missing for both, the focus here is on the underlying processing power impacting UI smoothness. The F31 Pro+'s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, with its more capable GPU, will contribute to a more fluid user interface and better graphics rendering, even if the panels themselves are similar. The 12nm process of the Helio G95 in the G60S will likely result in more heat generation during sustained graphical tasks, potentially impacting display performance over time.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the processing power of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the F31 Pro+ will likely result in superior image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is more advanced, enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and detail preservation. While the G60S may capture acceptable images, the F31 Pro+ is expected to deliver consistently higher-quality photos and videos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F31 Pro+’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Motorola Moto G60S’s Helio G95 (12nm). The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 utilizes newer Cortex-A715 cores, offering a substantial IPC (Instructions Per Clock) improvement over the G95’s Cortex-A76 cores. The 4nm fabrication process further enhances efficiency, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The G60S’s Helio G95, while capable, will struggle to keep pace in demanding tasks and will likely exhibit more throttling under load. The F31 Pro+'s CPU configuration (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) is optimized for both peak performance and efficiency, unlike the G60S's 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55.
Battery Life
The Moto G60S boasts 50W wired charging with QC4 support, while the Oppo F31 Pro+ offers a more versatile charging solution with 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 33W PPS. The G60S’s 50W charging will likely achieve a 0-100% charge faster than the F31 Pro+'s 80W, but the F31 Pro+'s broader compatibility with charging standards is a significant advantage. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s superior efficiency may also contribute to slightly better battery life in real-world usage, offsetting any potential capacity differences (which are not specified).
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F31 Pro+ if you prioritize performance for gaming, demanding apps, and future-proofing. Its modern chipset and efficient architecture will provide a smoother experience for years to come. Buy the Motorola Moto G60S if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and social media. It’s a solid option for users who value convenience over raw power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the Oppo F31 Pro+ handle demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't match the performance of flagship processors, it can comfortably run most popular titles at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 4nm process also helps mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G60S support 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling?
The provided specs do not indicate the refresh rate of the Moto G60S's display. However, given its positioning as a budget-friendly device, it's likely to feature a standard 60Hz panel. The Oppo F31 Pro+'s processor is better equipped to handle higher refresh rates if the display supports it.
❓ How does the charging speed of the Oppo F31 Pro+ compare to other phones with 80W charging?
The Oppo F31 Pro+'s 80W SuperVOOC charging is comparable to other phones utilizing the same technology. It can typically charge a phone from 0% to 100% in around 30-40 minutes, though the exact time depends on battery capacity. The inclusion of PD, UFCS, and PPS adds versatility, allowing it to charge with a wider range of chargers.
