The Oppo F31 Pro and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China variant) represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series, they diverge significantly in chipset generation and charging technology, creating a fascinating battle between efficiency and raw power. This comparison will dissect these differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the Oppo F31 Pro emerges as the winner. Its newer Dimensity 7300, built on a 4nm process, offers a more efficient architecture, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during extended use, coupled with the industry-leading 80W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 16 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 16 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 75 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | DT-Star D+ | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2372 pixels (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 105.0 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 13.5W QC, UFCS, 37% in 20 min
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Grey, Desert Gold | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | CPH2763 | - |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.13 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F31 Pro
- Faster 80W charging with multiple protocol support
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management for sustained performance
- Slightly lower peak CPU clock speed compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro
- Camera specs unknown, potential for lower resolution main sensor
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Higher peak CPU clock speed for short bursts of performance
- Established reputation for camera quality in the Redmi Note series
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 1100 chipset
- Slower 67W charging compared to Oppo F31 Pro
- Potential for thermal throttling during prolonged use
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket. However, the core difference lies beneath the surface. The Redmi Note 10 Pro, being an older model, may utilize a less efficient panel technology. The Oppo F31 Pro, benefiting from newer display tech, could offer improved color accuracy and potentially higher peak brightness, though this requires further testing. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both devices, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but given the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s history, it likely features a high-resolution main sensor. However, the image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 7300 is more advanced, offering improved noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality. The Oppo F31 Pro’s ISP is likely to excel in low-light photography and video recording. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the newer chipset gives Oppo a clear edge in image processing capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap is defined by the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Dimensity 1100 (6nm) boasts a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz on the F31 Pro’s Dimensity 7300). However, the Oppo F31 Pro’s Dimensity 7300, fabricated on a more advanced 4nm process, offers superior transistor density and power efficiency. This translates to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. While the 1100 might win in short benchmark bursts, the 7300 is likely to maintain higher average frame rates during prolonged gaming sessions. Both utilize the same Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency, but the architectural improvements in the 7300’s A78 cores provide a noticeable advantage.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro offers 67W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 42 minutes. The Oppo F31 Pro significantly raises the bar with its 80W SuperVOOC charging, reaching 37% charge in just 20 minutes. While battery capacity isn't specified, the 4nm efficiency of the Dimensity 7300 in the F31 Pro should offset any potential capacity difference. The inclusion of PPS, PD, QC, and UFCS charging protocols on the Oppo F31 Pro also provides greater compatibility with a wider range of chargers and accessories. The 10W reverse wired charging on the F31 Pro is a useful addition for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F31 Pro if you need a phone that can handle demanding tasks for longer periods without significant performance drops, and if minimizing charging time is a top priority. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prioritize raw CPU power for short bursts of intensive tasks and are comfortable with a slightly slower charging experience. The Redmi Note 10 Pro may also appeal to users who prefer Xiaomi's MIUI software.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7300 in the Oppo F31 Pro handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
The Dimensity 7300's architecture and 4nm process are well-suited for demanding games. While frame rates will depend on the game's optimization, the F31 Pro should deliver a smoother and more consistent experience than the Redmi Note 10 Pro, thanks to its superior thermal management and efficiency.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Oppo F31 Pro compared to the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro in real-world use?
The Oppo F31 Pro's 80W charging is demonstrably faster. While the Redmi Note 10 Pro takes 42 minutes for a full charge, the F31 Pro reaches 37% in just 20 minutes. This translates to significantly less time tethered to a charger, especially for quick top-ups.
❓ Does the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro experience noticeable thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1100, being a 6nm chip, is more prone to thermal throttling than the 4nm Dimensity 7300. Users may experience frame drops and reduced performance after prolonged gaming, particularly in graphically intensive titles.
❓ What charging protocols does the Oppo F31 Pro support beyond SuperVOOC?
The Oppo F31 Pro supports a wide range of charging protocols including 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 13.5W QC, and UFCS, offering excellent compatibility with various chargers and accessories. This versatility is a significant advantage over the Redmi Note 10 Pro.
