Oppo F31 Pro vs. OnePlus Nord CE 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and incredibly fast charging, the Oppo F31 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset offers a significant leap over the Snapdragon 750G. However, the OnePlus Nord CE 5G remains a compelling option for those seeking a reliable, well-rounded device at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo F31 Pro | OnePlus Nord CE 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 16 | 2021, June 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 16 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 75 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 159.2 x 73.5 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | DT-Star D+ | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2372 pixels (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 105.0 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 13.5W QC, UFCS, 37% in 20 min 10W reverse wired | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Grey, Desert Gold | Blue Void, Charkoal Ink, Silver Ray |
| Models | CPH2763 | EB2101, EB2103 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 1.13 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.9 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318672 (v8) | 391770 (v9) GeekBench: 1812 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F31 Pro
- Significantly faster charging (80W)
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 7300)
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Display specifications currently unknown
- Camera details limited
OnePlus Nord CE 5G
- Solid battery endurance (117h)
- Good peak brightness (607 nits)
- Potentially more affordable price
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 750G)
- Slower charging (30W)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord CE 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 607 nits, which is respectable for outdoor visibility. However, the Oppo F31 Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct brightness comparison impossible. Given Oppo’s recent focus on display quality, it’s reasonable to expect a comparable or potentially superior panel. Both devices feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED/AMOLED displays. Without knowing the panel technology used in the F31 Pro, it's difficult to assess potential differences in color accuracy or viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a definitive comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the Oppo F31 Pro may prioritize camera performance, potentially featuring a larger sensor or more advanced image processing algorithms. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are likely included for marketing purposes rather than significant photographic utility. Image quality will ultimately depend on software optimization and the quality of the primary sensor.
Performance
The Oppo F31 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) found in the OnePlus Nord CE 5G. The Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, offer significantly higher single-core performance than the Snapdragon 750G’s Kryo 570 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 4nm process node further enhances efficiency, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. While the Nord CE 5G’s octa-core CPU is capable, the F31 Pro is geared towards more demanding applications and gaming. The F31 Pro will likely exhibit less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo F31 Pro and OnePlus Nord CE 5G achieve an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Oppo F31 Pro’s 80W wired charging, with support for 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 13.5W QC, and UFCS, is significantly faster than the Nord CE 5G’s 30W charging. The F31 Pro can reportedly gain 37% charge in just 20 minutes, while the Nord CE 5G requires 30 minutes to reach 70%. The F31 Pro also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Nord CE 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F31 Pro if you need a phone that can handle demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if minimizing charging time is a top priority. Its 80W charging is a game-changer. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 5G if you prefer a more balanced experience with a focus on consistent performance, good battery endurance, and a potentially more affordable price. It's ideal for everyday use and media consumption.