The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F29 and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The F29 aims for efficient all-around performance with the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Poco X6 Pro aggressively targets gamers and power users with the significantly more potent Dimensity 8300 Ultra. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers substantially higher performance, and its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Oppo F29 offers respectable efficiency, the X6 Pro’s power advantage is too significant to ignore.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 20 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), fiber-fabric back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 74.5 x 7.7 mm (6.36 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g or 189 g (6.53 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, 30% in 21 min | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Deep Purple, Glacier Blue | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo F29
- Potentially better power efficiency with Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
- Sleek design (assumed based on Oppo’s brand aesthetic)
- Competitive price point (likely)
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X6 Pro
- Limited camera information available
- Slower charging speed (45W)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Exceptional performance with the Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Fast 67W charging with multiple protocols
- Bright and likely high-quality display (1148 nits)
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- May be slightly more expensive than the Oppo F29
- 2MP macro camera offers limited utility
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Oppo F29 (brightness data unavailable, but likely lower given the chipset tier). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, display technology details for the F29 are missing; the X6 Pro’s brightness suggests a higher-quality panel. The absence of refresh rate information for the F29 is a notable omission, while the X6 Pro’s display is likely to offer a smoother experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Oppo F29 are limited, making a direct comparison challenging. The Poco X6 Pro’s camera system, while details are sparse, likely focuses on photo and video capabilities. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the X6 Pro is a common inclusion but offers limited practical benefit compared to a well-executed primary sensor. The X6 Pro’s image processing algorithms will likely prioritize vibrant colors and detail, while the F29’s approach remains unknown.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, with its 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core and 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, is in a different league than the Oppo F29’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s core configuration and higher clock speeds translate to significantly faster processing and graphics capabilities, crucial for gaming and demanding applications. The X6 Pro’s likely use of LPDDR5x RAM further enhances performance, while the F29’s RAM specification is unknown. Thermal management will be key for the X6 Pro to sustain peak performance, but the chipset’s inherent efficiency should mitigate throttling.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 11:46h. While the Oppo F29’s battery capacity is unknown, the X6 Pro’s longer runtime suggests a larger battery or more efficient power management. Crucially, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support allows for a full charge in just 45 minutes, a significant time saving compared to the Oppo F29’s 45W charging, which takes 21 minutes to reach 30%. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F29 if you prioritize a balanced experience with good efficiency and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand high performance for gaming, demanding apps, or frequent multitasking, and value faster charging speeds to minimize interruptions.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is a powerful chipset, Mediatek has focused on improving thermal efficiency in recent generations. The X6 Pro likely incorporates cooling solutions to mitigate throttling, but sustained peak performance may result in some heat buildup. Expect some performance reduction after extended gaming, but it should remain playable.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Oppo F29 slow compared to the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W?
Yes, the 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro is considerably faster. While 45W is still respectable, the X6 Pro’s charging speed allows for a full charge in 45 minutes, while the F29 takes 21 minutes to reach only 30%. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro support high refresh rate gaming?
While the exact refresh rate isn't specified in the provided data, the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is capable of driving high refresh rate displays. It's highly probable the Poco X6 Pro supports at least 120Hz, enabling smoother gameplay in compatible titles. Check the full specifications for confirmation.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the Oppo F29 handle multitasking?
The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is a capable processor for everyday multitasking, handling apps like social media, browsing, and messaging without issue. However, it will likely struggle with demanding multitasking scenarios involving multiple resource-intensive applications simultaneously, where the Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra would excel.
