The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F29 and Realme 12 Pro+ represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. While both devices leverage Qualcomm's Snapdragon platform, they diverge in chipset choice, charging capabilities, and overall performance profile. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset delivers noticeably better performance, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Oppo F29 offers a respectable experience, the Realme 12 Pro+ provides a more future-proof and responsive user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 20 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), fiber-fabric back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 74.5 x 7.7 mm (6.36 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g or 189 g (6.53 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, 30% in 21 min | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Deep Purple, Glacier Blue | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | - | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F29
- Potentially more efficient chipset for longer light usage.
- Competitive price point (likely).
- Reliable Qualcomm Snapdragon platform.
- Slower charging speed (45W vs 67W).
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Realme 12 Pro+.
- Display brightness likely lower than the Realme 12 Pro+.
Realme 12 Pro+
- Faster 67W charging for quick top-ups.
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset.
- Excellent battery life (13:24h active use).
- Higher peak display brightness (802 nits).
- May be slightly more expensive than the Oppo F29.
- Potentially higher power consumption due to the more powerful chipset.
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 802 nits, a significant advantage over the Oppo F29 (brightness data unavailable). This higher brightness translates to improved visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the market segment, the Realme’s higher peak brightness suggests a more advanced panel. Without specific refresh rate data for the Oppo F29, it’s difficult to assess smoothness, but the Realme 12 Pro+ is expected to offer a standard 120Hz experience, enhancing scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond sensor resolution are absent for both devices. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is positioned as a camera-focused device, suggesting a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes. While both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, the Realme’s marketing emphasizes its imaging capabilities, hinting at better low-light performance and dynamic range. Without further data, it’s difficult to assess the quality of the secondary lenses on either device, but focusing on the main sensor performance is crucial.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 12 Pro+ features the Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm), with a CPU configuration of 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55. This is a step up from the Oppo F29’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) – 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. The higher clock speeds on the 7s Gen 2, coupled with architectural refinements, result in a demonstrably faster and more responsive experience, particularly in demanding applications and games. Both utilize a 4nm process, contributing to efficiency, but the 7s Gen 2’s superior architecture provides a performance edge.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ shines in battery charging speed, achieving 50% charge in just 19 minutes with its 67W wired charging. The Oppo F29, with 45W charging, takes 21 minutes to reach 30%. While the Realme 12 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 13:24h indicates excellent battery life. The faster charging speed is a significant convenience factor, minimizing downtime and ensuring you can quickly get back to using your phone. The Oppo F29’s 45W charging is still respectable, but lags behind the Realme in terms of speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F29 if you prioritize a slightly more conservative power draw and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, calls, and light browsing. Its 45W charging is adequate for moderate users. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you demand smoother multitasking, enjoy mobile gaming, or frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and 67W charging make it the clear winner for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Realme 12 Pro+ handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is capable of running Genshin Impact and similar titles at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the Oppo F29.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ compared to the 45W charging on the Oppo F29 in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ offers a substantial time saving. Reaching 50% charge in 19 minutes versus 30% in 21 minutes for the Oppo F29 means you'll gain a significant amount of battery life in a shorter period, especially useful for users who frequently need to quickly top up their device.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 and Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both chipsets are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Realme 12 Pro+ provides a smoother and more responsive experience. App loading times will be faster, multitasking will be more fluid, and animations will appear more seamless.
