The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F29 and Motorola Edge 50 Pro represent compelling options. The F29 focuses on efficient performance with the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Edge 50 Pro aims for a premium experience with a faster chipset and significantly quicker charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of affordability and performance, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset delivers noticeably better performance, and the 125W charging is a game-changer, offsetting the slightly higher price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 20 | 2024, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), fiber-fabric back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 74.5 x 7.7 mm (6.36 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g or 189 g (6.53 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 720 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
10 MP, f/2.0, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, 30% in 21 min | 125W wired, 100% in 18 min
50W wireless
10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Deep Purple, Glacier Blue | Luxe Lavender, Black Beauty, Moonlight Pearl, Vanilla Cream |
| Models | - | XT2403-2 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 410.57 / $ 399.00 / £ 369.99 / ₹ 22,995 |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
Oppo F29
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speeds (45W)
- Less powerful processor compared to the Edge 50 Pro
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- Significantly faster 125W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Brighter and potentially higher-quality display
- 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1295 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Oppo F29 (brightness data unavailable, but expected to be lower given the chipset tier). While panel technology details are missing for the F29, the Edge 50 Pro’s brightness suggests a higher-quality panel. The lack of LTPO on either device means refresh rate scaling isn’t as efficient as on flagship models, but the Edge 50 Pro’s superior peak brightness is a clear advantage for visual clarity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, positioned as a more premium offering, likely features a more sophisticated camera system. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced than the 6 Gen 1’s, enabling better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. We can assume the Edge 50 Pro will deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Edge 50 Pro, while unconfirmed, is highly probable given its price point and would further enhance image and video stability.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial leap in performance over the Oppo F29’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm). The 7 Gen 3 utilizes a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A715 cores versus the F29’s A78 – resulting in faster processing speeds and improved multi-tasking capabilities. The Edge 50 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) is more balanced and efficient than the F29’s (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). While both are 4nm chips, the architectural improvements in the 7 Gen 3 translate to a more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s charging capabilities are a standout feature. Its 125W wired charging can fully charge the battery in just 18 minutes, a significant advantage over the Oppo F29’s 45W charging, which takes 21 minutes to reach 30%. The Edge 50 Pro also includes 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the F29. While the Edge 50 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 11:59h suggests excellent battery life, likely optimized by the efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset. The F29’s battery life, while respectable, will likely be shorter due to the less powerful chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F29 if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery efficiency and a focus on cost-effectiveness. It’s ideal for users who prioritize essential features over raw power. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, faster charging speeds, and a brighter, more vibrant display – especially if you frequently consume media or play demanding games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the Motorola Edge 50 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is a powerful chip, Qualcomm has focused on thermal efficiency improvements. The 4nm process and optimized architecture help mitigate heat generation. However, prolonged, demanding gaming will inevitably lead to some warming, but it's unlikely to cause significant throttling compared to older chipsets.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Oppo F29 slow compared to the competition?
45W charging is adequate for topping up the battery overnight or during downtime, but it's considerably slower than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s 125W charging. Expect a full charge to take significantly longer, potentially over an hour, depending on the battery capacity.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 handle multitasking and app switching?
The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is capable of handling everyday multitasking and app switching without significant lag. However, it may struggle with numerous demanding apps running simultaneously, potentially leading to slower response times compared to the more powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 3.
