Oppo F29 Pro vs Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F29 Pro and Google Pixel 7a represent compelling options. The F29 Pro aims to deliver rapid charging and strong performance with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy chipset, while the Pixel 7a leverages Google’s Tensor G2 for AI-powered features and a refined camera experience. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the better choice. However, the Oppo F29 Pro’s significantly faster 80W charging and potentially more sustained performance due to its 4nm node make it ideal for power users and gamers who value convenience and longevity during intensive tasks.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo F29 Pro Google Pixel 7a
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8
Launch
Announced2025, March 202023, May 10
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, April 01Available. Released 2023, May 10
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), fiber fabric backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back
Dimensions161.5 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.36 x 2.95 x 0.30 in)152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + eSIM
Weight180 g (6.35 oz)193.5 g (6.84 oz)
 -IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM)OLED, HDR, 90Hz
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)
GPUMali-G615 MC2Mali-G710 MP7
OSAndroid 15, ColorOS 15Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM
 -UFS 3.1
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.88", PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
FeaturesColor spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS, OIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.4, (wide)13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYes-
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging80W wired, PD, 45% in 20 min18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 6000 mAhLi-Po 4385 mAh
Misc
ColorsMarble White, Granite BlackCharcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral
ModelsCPH2705GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8
PriceAbout 300 EUR€ 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980
SAR1.00 W/kg (head)     0.77 W/kg (body)-

Oppo F29 Pro

  • Significantly faster 80W charging
  • Potentially better thermal management with 4nm Dimensity 7300 Energy
  • PD charging support

  • Camera performance likely inferior to Pixel 7a
  • Software updates may be less frequent than Pixel 7a

Google Pixel 7a

  • Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
  • Streamlined and optimized software experience
  • Guaranteed software updates and long-term support

  • Slow 18W charging
  • Potential for throttling under sustained load

Display Comparison

The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo F29 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to offer competitive brightness. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel is known for its accurate color reproduction, a key benefit for content creators and media consumers. Without knowing the panel technology of the F29 Pro, it’s difficult to assess potential differences in color gamut coverage or viewing angles. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (implied by its market position) provides smoother scrolling and animations compared to a standard 60Hz panel, though the F29 Pro’s refresh rate is unknown.

Camera Comparison

The Pixel 7a is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s image processing algorithms to deliver consistently excellent photos and videos. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, the Pixel 7a’s camera excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Oppo F29 Pro’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison. However, the Pixel 7a’s focus on software-driven image quality often surpasses hardware specifications alone. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also strong, with excellent stabilization and dynamic range. Without knowing the Oppo F29 Pro’s sensor size, aperture, and image processing pipeline, it’s difficult to assess its video performance.

Performance

The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a unique CPU configuration with 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 cores for peak performance and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. This contrasts with the Oppo F29 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4nm) which utilizes 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7300 Energy suggests better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during prolonged gaming sessions compared to the 5nm Tensor G2. The Cortex-X1 cores in the Pixel 7a offer higher single-core performance, beneficial for tasks like app loading and responsiveness, but the Dimensity 7300’s core count and architecture may excel in multi-threaded workloads. The Pixel 7a benefits from Google’s software optimization, but the F29 Pro’s chipset is designed for efficient power delivery.

Battery Life

The Google Pixel 7a boasts an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the Oppo F29 Pro’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of adding 45% charge in just 20 minutes. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging is significantly slower, taking considerably longer to fully charge. While the Pixel 7a’s battery endurance suggests a larger capacity, the F29 Pro’s rapid charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, offering greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their device. The F29 Pro also supports PD charging, while the Pixel 7a supports PD3.0. The F29 Pro also offers 7.5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 7a.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo F29 Pro if you need blazing-fast charging, prioritize sustained gaming performance, and appreciate a more customizable Android experience. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a streamlined software experience, exceptional camera capabilities powered by Google’s computational photography, and long-term software support with guaranteed updates.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy in the Oppo F29 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The 4nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 7300 Energy is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, it’s likely to be better managed than the 5nm Tensor G2 in the Pixel 7a, potentially resulting in less performance throttling over extended periods. However, real-world performance will depend on the phone’s cooling system.
❓ How does the Pixel 7a’s camera perform in low-light conditions compared to other phones in its price range?
The Pixel 7a consistently ranks among the best in low-light photography within its price bracket. Google’s Night Sight mode utilizes advanced computational photography to capture bright, detailed images with minimal noise, even in extremely dark environments. It excels at preserving detail and color accuracy in challenging lighting conditions.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Pixel 7a a significant drawback in 2024?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow compared to the 80W charging offered by the Oppo F29 Pro and many other phones in the mid-range segment. It will take considerably longer to fully charge the Pixel 7a, which can be inconvenient for users who need a quick power boost.