The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F27 and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of performance and affordability. While both devices utilize Mediatek Dimensity chipsets, they target slightly different priorities – the F27 leaning towards everyday usability and the X6 Pro aiming for a more robust gaming experience. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right phone.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing daily tasks and moderate gaming, the Oppo F27 offers excellent value. However, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the clear winner for gamers and power users, thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset and faster 67W charging, justifying the price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 20 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 20 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HMB), 2100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0
Reverse wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Emerald Green, Amber Orange | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | ₹ 18,999 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo F27
- Excellent value for money
- Efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset for daily tasks
- 45W fast charging with PD3.0
- Less powerful chipset for gaming
- Likely dimmer display compared to the X6 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra for gaming and multitasking
- Bright 1148 nit display for excellent visibility
- 67W fast charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0
- Higher price point
- Potentially higher power consumption
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo F27’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The X6 Pro’s higher brightness translates to a more immersive viewing experience for videos and games. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the X6 Pro’s superior panel will likely offer better color accuracy and contrast.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo F27, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Poco X6 Pro likely benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 8300 Ultra. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the X6 Pro’s processing capabilities will likely result in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the X6 Pro (assumed based on market segment) would further enhance image and video quality, particularly in challenging conditions. We can expect the X6 Pro to offer more versatile photography options.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo F27’s Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The 8300 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – provides a significant performance boost over the F27’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process node of the 8300 Ultra also contributes to better thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. This means the X6 Pro will maintain higher frame rates for longer periods. The F27 will be adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates superior real-world battery performance, achieving an active use score of 11:46h. While the Oppo F27’s battery capacity is unknown, the X6 Pro’s 67W charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support allows for a full charge in just 45 minutes. The F27’s 45W charging, while respectable, is slower. The combination of efficient chipset and fast charging gives the X6 Pro a clear advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F27 if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and efficient performance for social media, browsing, and casual gaming. It’s ideal for users who prioritize value and don’t demand the absolute highest frame rates in demanding titles. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a phone capable of handling graphically intensive games at high settings, benefit from faster charging speeds, and appreciate a brighter, more vibrant display. This is the choice for mobile gaming enthusiasts and those who multitask heavily.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which is more efficient than the 6nm process used in the Oppo F27’s Dimensity 6300. This improved efficiency helps to manage heat better. While some warmth is expected during prolonged gaming, the X6 Pro is designed to minimize throttling and maintain consistent performance for longer periods.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Oppo F27 sufficient for daily use, or is it too slow?
45W charging is adequate for overnight charging and will provide a reasonable top-up during the day. However, the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W charging is significantly faster, allowing for a full charge in just 45 minutes. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly recharge your phone, the X6 Pro’s faster charging is a considerable advantage.
❓ What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the Oppo F27?
The Oppo F27’s Dimensity 6300 is capable of handling most popular mobile games at medium settings. However, demanding titles like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty: Mobile may require lower graphics settings to maintain a smooth frame rate. It’s best suited for casual gamers and those who prioritize battery life over maximum graphical fidelity.
