The Xiaomi 14T Pro and Oppo F27 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series, they diverge significantly in chipset choice and charging capabilities, creating a clear distinction for performance-focused users versus those prioritizing rapid replenishment. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset delivers substantially higher performance, and its 120W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Oppo F27 Pro+ offers a respectable experience, it can't match the raw power and speed of its rival.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 13 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 20 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 56% in 20 min
Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min
50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | CPH2643 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | ₹ 20,990 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo F27 Pro+
- Competitive price point
- Respectable performance for everyday tasks
- 67W fast charging with reverse wired charging
- Dimensity 7050 chipset is outmatched by the 9300+
- Display brightness likely lower than the Xiaomi 14T Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Superior performance with Dimensity 9300+
- Incredibly fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Excellent battery life (12:32h active use)
- Potentially higher price tag
- May run hotter under sustained load (though the 4nm process helps)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1228 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo F27 Pro+'s display specifications are not provided, the Xiaomi's brightness advantage is substantial. The Xiaomi 14T Pro's panel likely benefits from a higher peak brightness to compensate for its larger screen size, offering a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. We expect both to utilize AMOLED technology, but the Xiaomi's superior brightness is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo F27 Pro+, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, leveraging the processing power of the Dimensity 9300+ for superior image quality and computational photography. The Xiaomi's chipset will likely enable faster image processing, improved low-light performance, and more sophisticated features like advanced HDR algorithms. We anticipate the Xiaomi to have a larger main sensor, contributing to better detail and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 14T Pro's Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) is a generational leap ahead of the Oppo F27 Pro+'s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 9300+ features a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core alongside 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores, offering significantly improved single-core and multi-core performance compared to the F27 Pro+'s 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 4nm process node further enhances efficiency, reducing thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience on the Xiaomi.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro excels in charging speed, supporting 120W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. It also offers 50W wireless charging, reaching 100% in 45 minutes. The Oppo F27 Pro+ offers 67W wired charging, reaching 56% in 20 minutes. While the Xiaomi 14T Pro's battery capacity isn't specified, its active use score of 12:32h suggests excellent battery life. The faster charging speeds of the Xiaomi 14T Pro significantly reduce downtime, making it ideal for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F27 Pro+ if you prioritize a balance of features and value, and aren't heavily reliant on demanding mobile games or intensive applications. Its 67W charging is still fast, and the Dimensity 7050 is capable for everyday tasks. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, content creation, or multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging – both wired and wireless.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 9300+ in the Xiaomi 14T Pro generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9300+ is a powerful chip, the 4nm manufacturing process helps mitigate heat generation. The Xiaomi 14T Pro is expected to incorporate effective thermal management solutions, such as vapor chamber cooling, to prevent significant throttling during extended gaming. However, some heat is inevitable with high-performance chips.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Oppo F27 Pro+ compare to the 120W charging on the Xiaomi 14T Pro in real-world usage?
The 120W charging on the Xiaomi 14T Pro is significantly faster. While 67W is still considered fast charging, it takes considerably longer to fully charge the device. The Xiaomi 14T Pro can achieve a full charge in approximately 19 minutes, whereas the Oppo F27 Pro+ takes longer to reach even 56% charge in 20 minutes.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Dimensity 7050 and 9300+ noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks, the difference may not be immediately apparent. However, the Dimensity 9300+ provides a smoother and more responsive experience when multitasking, switching between apps, or performing more demanding operations like video editing. The Xiaomi 14T Pro will feel noticeably faster and more fluid overall.
