The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F27 Pro+ and Nothing Phone (2a) Plus both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag. The F27 Pro+ focuses on rapid charging and a familiar Oppo experience, while the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus emphasizes a clean software experience and a brighter display. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a vibrant display, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset, coupled with a measured 1097 nits peak brightness, provides a smoother experience and better visibility, despite the Oppo's faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 13 | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 20 | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 56% in 20 min
Reverse wired | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Black, Grey |
| Models | CPH2643 | A142P |
| Price | ₹ 20,990 | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo F27 Pro+
- Extremely fast 67W charging
- Potential for vibrant, Oppo-tuned color profiles
- Likely competitive pricing within the mid-range segment
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Unknown battery capacity and potential for shorter runtime
- Limited display brightness information
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Excellent 16:34h active use battery life
- Bright 1097 nits display for outdoor visibility
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset
- Slower 50W charging compared to Oppo
- Clean software may lack some of Oppo's feature richness
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus boasts a significant advantage in display brightness, reaching a measured 1097 nits. This translates to superior outdoor visibility compared to the Oppo F27 Pro+, which lacks published brightness data. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Nothing Phone’s higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit. We expect both to have similar color accuracy, but the Nothing Phone’s brightness gives it an edge for users who spend significant time outdoors or in brightly lit environments.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Oppo F27 Pro+, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests both phones will likely feature a primary camera around the 50MP mark. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s image processing is known for its natural color reproduction, while Oppo typically leans towards more vibrant, saturated images. The absence of information regarding OIS on the Oppo F27 Pro+ suggests the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus may offer better low-light performance and video stabilization. We'd advise users to disregard any 2MP macro lenses on either device, as their image quality is typically subpar.
Performance
Under the hood, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus features the Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro, fabricated on a more efficient 4nm process, compared to the Oppo F27 Pro+'s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). This process node difference suggests the 7350 Pro will exhibit better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to sustained performance during demanding tasks. The CPU architecture also favors the Nothing Phone, with 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 cores versus the Oppo’s 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. While both have 6x2.0 GHz efficiency cores, the A715 offers architectural improvements. This translates to a noticeable performance uplift for the Nothing Phone in CPU-intensive applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 16:34h of active use. While the Oppo F27 Pro+’s battery capacity is unknown, its 67W charging is significantly faster than the Nothing Phone’s 50W. The Oppo can reach 56% charge in 20 minutes, while the Nothing Phone takes 21 minutes for 50% and 56 minutes for a full charge. This makes the Oppo ideal for users who need quick top-ups, but the Nothing Phone’s longer runtime reduces the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F27 Pro+ if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery throughout the day. Its 67W charging can add 56% charge in just 20 minutes. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you prioritize long-lasting battery life, a brighter and more visible display, and a cleaner, less cluttered software experience. The 16:34h active use score demonstrates its endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7350 Pro in the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7350 Pro's 4nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, it's expected to be better managed than the Oppo F27 Pro+'s 6nm Dimensity 7050, resulting in less throttling and more consistent frame rates.
❓ How does Nothing's Glyph Interface impact battery life on the (2a) Plus?
Nothing has optimized the Glyph Interface to minimize battery drain. While it does consume power, the impact is relatively small, and users can customize the Glyph patterns and duration to further reduce energy consumption. It's a feature that adds unique functionality without significantly compromising battery life.
❓ Is the 50W charging on the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus slow compared to the Oppo F27 Pro+'s 67W?
While 67W is faster on paper, the difference in real-world charging times isn't massive. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus reaches 50% in 21 minutes and 100% in 56 minutes. The superior battery life of the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus means you'll likely need to charge less frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed.
