The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F27 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options powered by MediaTek's Dimensity series. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take different approaches. The Poco X6 Pro prioritizes raw processing power with the Dimensity 8300 Ultra, while the Oppo F27 Pro focuses on a balanced package with the Dimensity 7050 and rapid charging.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset provides a significant performance uplift, crucial for demanding tasks and gaming. While the Oppo F27 Pro boasts faster charging, the Poco X6 Pro’s superior battery life in active use and overall processing power make it the better all-rounder.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm or 7.9 mm | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g or 182 g (6.24 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 56% in 20 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Pink, Mint | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | - | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo F27 Pro
- Faster 67W charging (56% in 20 mins)
- Potentially more streamlined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Potentially shorter battery life
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Brighter 1148 nit display
- Longer battery life (11:46h active use)
- Slightly slower full charge time (45 mins)
- Poco UI can be more cluttered than ColorOS
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits. This is a substantial advantage in outdoor visibility compared to the Oppo F27 Pro (brightness data unavailable, but likely lower based on chipset and market positioning). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X6 Pro’s higher brightness and potentially wider color gamut (speculation based on typical Poco implementations) offer a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price segment, but the X6 Pro’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. However, we can infer that the Poco X6 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system. Xiaomi typically prioritizes camera performance in its Poco lineup, often employing larger sensors and advanced image processing algorithms. The Oppo F27 Pro’s camera capabilities are likely competent, but may not match the X6 Pro in terms of dynamic range, low-light performance, or video stabilization. The absence of sensor size information necessitates caution, but the X6 Pro’s brand positioning suggests a more robust camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a clear step up from the Oppo F27 Pro’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 8300 Ultra features a more advanced CPU configuration – a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core alongside 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores – versus the F27 Pro’s 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to significantly faster processing speeds and improved multi-tasking capabilities. The 4nm process node of the 8300 Ultra also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. While both phones likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, the superior chipset in the Poco X6 Pro will maximize its potential.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the Oppo F27 Pro offers 67W charging with a claimed 56% charge in 20 minutes, the X6 Pro’s 67W charging (QC2.0, PD3.0) reaches 100% in 45 minutes. The X6 Pro’s longer active use time suggests a more efficient chipset and potentially a larger battery capacity (data unavailable for F27 Pro). The faster full charge time of the F27 Pro is appealing, but the X6 Pro’s superior battery life mitigates the slightly longer charging duration.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F27 Pro if you prioritize extremely fast charging and a streamlined user experience, and don't heavily rely on graphically intensive applications. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you're a gamer, a power user who frequently multitasks, or simply want the best possible performance for your money. The X6 Pro’s chipset delivers a noticeable advantage in demanding scenarios.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which inherently offers better thermal efficiency than the 6nm Dimensity 7050 in the Oppo F27 Pro. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the X6 Pro is less likely to experience significant throttling, maintaining higher frame rates for longer periods. Xiaomi also typically implements effective cooling solutions in the Poco series.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Oppo F27 Pro compare to the Poco X6 Pro in real-world usage?
While the Oppo F27 Pro charges to 56% in 20 minutes, the Poco X6 Pro takes 45 minutes for a full charge. However, the X6 Pro’s longer battery life means you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently. The F27 Pro’s faster initial charge is convenient, but the X6 Pro’s overall battery endurance provides a more practical benefit for most users.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Dimensity 7050 and 8300 Ultra noticeable for everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference may be subtle. However, when multitasking, editing photos/videos, or running demanding applications, the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro will provide a significantly smoother and more responsive experience. The extra processing power is most apparent when pushing the phone to its limits.
