The OnePlus 12R and Oppo F27 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The 12R, a recent release, aims to deliver flagship performance at a more accessible price point, while the F27 Pro focuses on a balance of features and affordability. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 12R emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides significantly faster processing power and superior thermal management compared to the Oppo F27 Pro’s Dimensity 7050. While the F27 Pro offers respectable charging speeds, the 12R’s longer battery life and overall performance justify its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm or 7.9 mm | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g or 182 g (6.24 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 56% in 20 min
Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Pink, Mint | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | - | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | - | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Oppo F27 Pro
- Faster 67W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- May offer a more compact form factor (speculation)
- Less powerful Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Likely inferior thermal management
- Potentially lower display quality
OnePlus 12R
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Excellent battery life (14:32h)
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Slightly higher price
- May run warmer under heavy load (though thermal management is good)
- Larger size compared to some competitors
Display Comparison
The Oppo F27 Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the OnePlus 12R boasts a bright display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1181 nits. This high brightness ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Without knowing the panel technology (LTPO or not) or refresh rate of the F27 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its smoothness and power efficiency. The 12R’s display is likely to offer a more premium viewing experience due to its confirmed brightness and likely higher refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo F27 Pro, a comprehensive comparison is limited. However, the OnePlus 12R is expected to have a more sophisticated camera system, leveraging the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s advanced image signal processor (ISP). The ISP enables faster image processing, improved dynamic range, and better low-light performance. While the F27 Pro may offer a competitive camera in its price range, the 12R’s chipset advantage likely provides a noticeable edge in image quality and video recording capabilities. We can assume the F27 Pro will include standard features like a night mode, but the 12R's processing will likely be more refined.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Oppo F27 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 features a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, alongside high-performance Cortex-A715 and A710 cores, offering substantially greater processing power than the F27 Pro’s 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. This benefits gamers and power users who demand consistent performance.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R shines in battery life, achieving an active use score of 14 hours and 32 minutes. While the Oppo F27 Pro offers a respectable 67W wired charging, reaching 56% charge in 20 minutes, the 12R’s 100W charging is significantly faster, achieving a full charge in just 26 minutes. This faster charging is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The 12R’s superior battery life, combined with its faster charging, makes it the more convenient option for all-day use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F27 Pro if you prioritize fast charging and a more budget-friendly price point, and your primary use case doesn't involve demanding gaming or heavy multitasking. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you demand flagship-level performance, extended battery life for all-day use, and a smoother overall experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7050 in the Oppo F27 Pro struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 7050 is a capable chip, but it will likely require lower graphics settings and may exhibit more frame drops compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the OnePlus 12R when playing demanding titles like Genshin Impact. The 8 Gen 2’s superior GPU and thermal management provide a smoother, more consistent gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the OnePlus 12R compared to the 67W charging on the Oppo F27 Pro in real-world use?
The 100W charging on the OnePlus 12R is significantly faster. While the F27 Pro reaches 56% in 20 minutes, the 12R can achieve a full charge in 26 minutes. This means you can add a substantial amount of battery life in a shorter time with the 12R, making it ideal for users who are always on the go.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the OnePlus 12R get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a powerful chip, the OnePlus 12R incorporates effective thermal management solutions. It may get warm during prolonged gaming, but it's unlikely to experience significant throttling, maintaining consistent performance for longer periods compared to devices with less efficient chipsets and cooling systems.
