The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F23 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. While both devices operate within a similar price bracket, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in chipset and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a potentially smoother experience with demanding apps, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is the better choice. Its 120W charging and Dimensity 1080 chipset offer a tangible advantage. However, the Oppo F23 provides a solid, efficient experience for everyday tasks and benefits from Qualcomm's established optimization.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 15 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 18 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min (advertised) | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Bold Gold | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition |
| Models | CPH2527 | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949 |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 88h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.7 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 498710 (v9)
GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F23
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset for everyday tasks.
- Reliable 67W fast charging.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Less powerful processor compared to the Dimensity 1080.
- Limited information on display quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging.
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset.
- High endurance rating (88h).
- Potentially lower battery efficiency due to higher performance.
- May be more expensive than the Oppo F23.
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a vibrant display experience, though specific peak brightness and color accuracy data are absent. The Oppo F23’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given its positioning, it likely utilizes an IPS LCD panel, potentially lacking the OLED’s superior contrast found on the Redmi Note 12 Pro+. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for optimized power consumption.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond the presence of a photo/video capability are lacking for both devices. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is known for its 200MP main sensor (outside of the provided context, but a key selling point), which, while not always indicative of superior image quality, offers significant potential for detail and cropping. The Oppo F23’s camera system is less publicized, suggesting a more modest approach. Without aperture information or sensor sizes, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ likely holds an advantage due to its higher resolution sensor and potentially larger sensor size.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1080, built on a 6nm process, featuring a Cortex-A78 based octa-core CPU clocked up to 2.6 GHz. This architecture prioritizes peak performance, offering a noticeable advantage over the Oppo F23’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. The Snapdragon 695, also on a 6nm process, employs Kryo 660 cores with a maximum clock speed of 2.2 GHz. While both are 6nm, the Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 1080 are architecturally superior, translating to faster processing speeds and improved responsiveness. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is likely to handle demanding games and multitasking with greater ease. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ also benefits from potentially faster RAM speeds (LPDDR5x is common with Dimensity chips) compared to the F23, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, promising a full charge in just 19 minutes (advertised). This is significantly faster than the Oppo F23’s 67W charging, which takes 18 minutes to reach 50%. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed mitigates concerns about a potentially smaller battery. The Oppo F23’s 67W charging is still respectable, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ offers a more convenient charging experience, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ also boasts an endurance rating of 88h, suggesting excellent battery optimization.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo F23 if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and efficient performance for standard tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming. It’s ideal for users who don’t push their phones to the limit. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ if you prioritize fast charging, smoother multitasking, and are willing to trade some potential efficiency for increased performance, especially if you frequently use resource-intensive applications or enjoy mobile gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 1080 in the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1080 is a powerful chip, Mediatek has made strides in thermal management. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ likely incorporates cooling solutions to mitigate heat, but sustained, high-intensity gaming may still result in some throttling. However, it's generally less prone to overheating than older Dimensity chips.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Oppo F23 sufficient for a full day of moderate use?
Yes, 67W charging is still a fast charging standard and should be sufficient to provide a full charge overnight or quickly top up the battery during a short break. While not as rapid as the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s 120W charging, it's more than adequate for most users.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 695's 5G connectivity compare to the Dimensity 1080 in real-world speeds?
Both chipsets support 5G, but the Dimensity 1080 generally offers more advanced 5G modem technology, potentially resulting in slightly faster and more stable 5G connections in areas with strong network coverage. However, real-world speeds are heavily dependent on carrier infrastructure and network conditions.
