The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo F23 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into every aspect, from display quality to battery life, to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro edges out the Oppo F23 thanks to its superior chipset, brighter display, and slightly faster charging. While the Oppo F23 offers a stylish design, the Redmi Note 12 Pro provides a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 15 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 18 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cool Black, Bold Gold | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | CPH2527 | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 490526 (v9)
GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo F23
- Stylish Design
- Compact Size
- Fast 67W Charging
- Good Value
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
- Potentially Less Camera Performance
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 1080 Chipset
- Brighter Display
- Excellent Battery Life
- Faster Charging (slightly)
- Potentially Better Camera
- Design may be less striking
- Software experience can vary
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 890 nits, significantly brighter than the Oppo F23. While both likely feature AMOLED panels (common for these brands), the Redmi Note 12 Pro's higher brightness offers better visibility in sunlight. The Redmi Note 12 Pro also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro likely holds an advantage. While specific megapixel counts are not the sole determinant of image quality, the Dimensity 1080's image signal processor (ISP) typically delivers better image processing and low-light performance. Expect slightly more detailed and vibrant photos from the Redmi Note 12 Pro.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's Dimensity 1080 chipset generally outperforms the Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 1080's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable boost in CPU performance, leading to smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. Gaming performance should also be better on the Redmi Note 12 Pro.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro demonstrates exceptional battery life, with an endurance rating of 97 hours and active use lasting 12 hours and 8 minutes. While the Oppo F23's 67W charging is fast, the Redmi Note 12 Pro charges slightly faster (50% in 15 minutes vs. 18 minutes). Both offer PD charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo F23 is a good choice for users prioritizing aesthetics and a slightly more compact design. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is ideal for those seeking better performance, a brighter display, and longer battery life, especially if photography is a key consideration.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, thanks to its Dimensity 1080 chipset, generally offers better gaming performance than the Oppo F23.
❓ Is the Oppo F23's design better than the Redmi Note 12 Pro?
The Oppo F23 often prioritizes aesthetics, so its design might be considered more visually appealing by some. However, design preference is subjective.
